Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Thursday, March 23, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home World Diplomacy

Russia should fear a Soviet end

Martin Sokolov by Martin Sokolov
1 March 2022
in Diplomacy
Flag,Of,The,Soviet,Union,,Sickle,And,Hammer,Ruins,,Perestroika

flag of the Soviet Union, sickle and hammer ruins, perestroika . end of the USSR

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Belgium (Brussels Morning Newspaper) On 24 Feb 2022, Russia launched a second invasion of Ukraine, greatly intensifying the war that the Kremlin has been waging on the country since 2014. Neither Europe nor the world at large has witnessed a similar event since the end of the Second World War. While Ukrainians suffer, Moscow faces the prospect of domestic upheaval and even the implosion of the Russian Federation, of the kind the USSR experienced in 1989.

The situation in Russia today is the result of a series of policies adopted in the 90s by political strategists, oligarchs, and strongmen who sought a successor to President Boris Yeltsin. The candidate identified was Vladimir Putin, tasked with re-establishing control over the country’s economy and society without losing the international legitimacy that stems from being a democracy.

By establishing a Russian sovereign democracy, President Putin was able to simulate political pluralism, engage in globalization, and selective rule of law regime. Through the engagement of Russian oligarchs in government and majority shareholding power in strategic sectors, Russia created a hybrid regime. An integral part of this regime was the promise that oligarchs could shift part of their assets to the West, partly shielding their security.

However, since 2014’s illegal annexation of Crimea, support for puppet separatist regimes in Eastern Ukraine, and Western sanctions, it has become difficult for Russian strongmen to spend their time and money in the West. This itself becomes problem number one: Vladimir Putin is no longer able to perform the role he was assigned, namely to be the powerbroker between oligarchs. The Russian president has feudalized the country, undermining governance in the Federation as power is overconcentrated and ineffective.

Russia annexed Crimea in an attempt to reassert itself as a regional and global power, protect strategic assets, counter NATO and EU enlargement, and discourage further alignments of post-Soviet states with the West. None of these objectives has been realized; instead, Moscow is increasingly isolated, while Russia faces crippling economic sanctions. To compensate for this failure, the Kremlin has engaged in counterproductive acts of weakness and desperation such as the attempted murder of Sergey Skripal in 2018, the 2016 coup attempt in Montenegro, the 2015 poisoning of Bulgarian arms dealer Emilian Gebrev, and the sabotage of the Czech ammunition depot in Vrbětice in 2014.

This invasion of Ukraine follows the same misguided disruptive strategy. It is almost certain that Russia was counting on a swift campaign – acquire control over airports and use air superiority to prevent Ukrainian maneuvers on the ground, cut off communications, enter Kyiv, and demoralize Ukrainian forces to crush hopes of sovereignty and discourage Western sanctions. The effect has little to do with the initial intentions. Russian expectations of a disorganised and fragmented response by the EU and NATO have proved illusory; the Ukrainian military response has been formidable. This objectively means that Russia is led towards a strategic stalemate, prolonged urban warfare, and political humiliation.

It should be noted that Moscow has a terrible track record in urban warfare in Syria, Chechnya, and Afghanistan. Unlike Syria and Chechnya, there is little to suggest that Russian public opinion considers this to be a just war. The longer the campaign lasts, the likelier it becomes that Russia’s own forces will be demoralised. The Kremlin has dispatched as many as 200,000 troops that will not suffice against motivated Ukrainian forces, volunteers, and the population. Moscow is trying to present itself as a liberator to a country that sees it as an aggressor. Time appears to be working against the Kremlin.

This objectively leaves the Kremlin with two incredibly bleak scenarios. First, there may be a domestic initiative to replace President Putin, who is unlikely to maintain the support of the oligarchic elite who brought him to office. The more unpopular the war, the less safe is his hold on power. Secondly, the lack of a popular political figure could challenge the unity of Russia’s vast territory, whose unity relies on coercion. It is to be noted that the Second Chechen War officially ended in 2009, with local strongman Ramzan Kadyrov coming to a new understanding with Vladimir Putin. That understanding could be reviewed if the balance of power changes. This scenario poses another long-term challenge for the West, as Russia’s collapse would present major security concerns in Europe and Asia.

Left unchecked, this unraveling of Russia begs the question of whether the world is able to avoid the challenge of nuclear escalation, amid socioeconomic and political disintegration and international isolation. Taking into consideration that Russian strategic planning views the limited use of nuclear weapons as legitimate, one should wonder whether the Kremlin’s rationality is a dependable factor. This “rationality” is less dependable given that the long reign of President Putin has eradicated critical voices in government that could hold his decisions in check.

Russia’s war in Ukraine presents Russia with the prospect of a catastrophe. There are no acceptable answers to Russia’s emerging medium-to-long term dilemmas, none of whom can be addressed by crude military might. The coming Russian tragedy objectively illustrates how in the grand scheme of things power over-centralisation is self-defeating.

Tags: Main-SliderOpinion sectionRussia should fear a Soviet end
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • Health & Fitness
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Brussels Bubble
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Wider Europe
    • Member States
  • World
  • Business & Society
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Culture & Society
  • Policy Talks
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Print Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT