Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Tuesday, May 17, 2022
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

The new European Maritime and Fisheries Fund is a greenlight for harmful overfishing

Francisco Guerreiro MEP by Francisco Guerreiro MEP
12 March 2021
in Opinion
The new European Maritime and Fisheries Fund is a greenlight for harmful overfishing

Moored Vessel in the seaport.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Denying a ringfenced pot of money to promote biodiversity and continuing harmful subsidies for the large-scale fishing industry, the new European Maritime and Fisheries Fund is irresponsible, writes Francisco Guerreiro MEP.

Brussels (Brussels Morning) On 22 February, the Greens/European Free Alliance (EFA) group voted against the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) agreement approved by the Fisheries Committee (PECH). 

The new EMFAF will provide 6,108 billion euros in current prices over the next seven years to support the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), as subsidies to the EU fishing sector, for control, data collection and other measures. 

As shadow rapporteur for the Greens/EFA Group on this file, I have tried, during the inter-institutional negotiations, to constructively reach compromises that would reverse or improve our main concerns, including the lack of sufficient ring-fenced funds for biodiversity and public support in the form of grants and financial instruments (loans) for lucrative private enterprises. 

Unfortunately, we did not manage to secure such compromises and could, therefore, not support the final agreement in the Fisheries Committee. Indeed, we also believe that many of the adopted measures can still be considered harmful subsidies that could lead to overfishing. 

25% for biodiversity…or not

In our view, the new fund is not ambitious enough in acknowledging the importance of protecting biodiversity and marine ecosystems. The Greens/EFA group successfully tabled an amendment that foresaw the ringfencing of 25% of the full EMFAF amount per member state to promote biodiversity but it did not secure the agreement the other political groups and Council. 

Consequently, the new EMFAF agreement falls short of the main Commission’s ambitions, like the European Green Deal and Biodiversity Strategy, while ignoring the last IPCC report on oceans.

For our Group, the message is simple: we need a resilient marine ecosystem and healthy fish stocks to continue sustainable fishing in the future. Aquaculture alone is not the answer and neither is the consumption of more fish. 

Grants for lucrative large-scale industry

Our group’s objective was to help exclusively the fishers that need it the most, that is the small-scale coastal fishers with vessels under 12 metres and no towed gear (SSCF), while avoiding any form of potential harmful subsidy. This stance was the European Parliament’s position at the start but the shift came quickly toward the Council’s opinion to expand support to larger vessels.

By making the funds available for vessels up to 24 metres (and above), there will be less funding available for the SSCF. Through our perspective, restricting support to financial instruments and for very limited types of investments would have been better than a dangerous trajectory toward overfishing. 

This decision makes little sense as large-scale fishing industry has seen profitability for years, leaving little reason to spend public money to support it. This industry can and should improve on-board conditions and modernise engines with their own funds, like any other business, to ensure safety and environmental legal compliance, improve the wellbeing of workers and to be innovative and competitive. 

What now? 

In the coming months, the new Regulation will need to be approved in plenary session, by the European Parliament, and in the Council as well. 

A future-proof agreement and step away from the traditional approach to fishing would have been the better outcome here. Political groups, member states and industry need to understand that by protecting and restoring the natural environment and fishing stocks today, we are helping the fishers of tomorrow. 

This fund should have been used to prioritise the protection of our ocean’s biodiversity and to restore ecosystems. The Greens/EFA group is committed to the long-term view, knowing that to continue with the business-as-usual model of giving away grants to the profitable, large-scale fishing sector is simply irresponsible.

Tags: Brussels DirectMain-SliderMEP

Latest post

Moscow,,Rus,,February,2022:,Flag,With,The,Gazprom,Logo,Waving

French Engie agrees on payment scheme with Gazprom

3 hours ago
EC approves Greek aid scheme worth €2bn

EC approves Greek aid scheme worth €2bn

3 hours ago

Most Read

  • shutterstock_1821616664

    MEPs send Open Letter urging the Home Secretary Priti Patel to reject Assange’s extradition

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • These are the 10 highest paying jobs in the Europe in 2022

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Brussels residents want to set up school for Ukrainian children

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why corruption matters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Sweden: Taking Syrian children away from parents for protection?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • EU Institutions
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Member States
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Print Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT