The age of the drone was born over Ukraine’s skies. In the searing crucible of conflict, the humble hobbyist’s toy has been transformed into an essential battlefield tool — cheap, adaptable, unstoppable.
Yet as the technology spreads, so does its shadow.
For organized crime, the Russo-Ukrainian War serves as a potent proof of concept for the true potential of drones, as detailed in ‘Crime by drone: A new paradigm for organized crime’, a new report by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime.
Already there are signs that the technology, expertise and know-how is leaking into the underworld. In October, reports surfaced of a Mexican cartel member training as a drone pilot in Ukraine’s International Legion, intent on taking his combat-honed skills home. Fibre-optic-guided drones, a Ukrainian innovation to evade jamming, have since appeared in Latin America. When police in Rio de Janeiro launched a ‘mega-operation’ targeting the Comando Vermelho (Red Command – CV), one of Brazil’s largest criminal organizations, they faced bombs dropped from drones. Risk has already become reality.
Across Europe, the signs are equally unsettling. Drones have shut down airports in Denmark, Norway and Belgium; Poland has intercepted Russian UAVs testing NATO reactions; Belgian investigators recently foiled a jihadist plot to attack the prime minister with an explosive-laden drone. The language of “drone walls” and “urban domes” is creeping into European politics. But amid the focus on state threats and terrorism, a more pervasive danger is quietly taking shape: the criminal use of drones.
Drones now give traffickers, smugglers and hitmen a low-risk, high-reward tool that spans borders and domains: air, land and sea. Small quadcopters already drop contraband into prisons and fly cigarettes and packets of drugs across borders. Larger drones ship arms across borders into Gaza. At the other end of the spectrum, maritime drones can move hundreds of kilograms of cocaine on and below the surface, while land robots can carry significant weights without a human in sight. Each step reduces risk for the criminal and makes law enforcement’s job harder.
Europe’s agencies are scrambling to keep up, but current regulation treats drones as a civil-aviation issue, not an organised-crime threat. There is no single EU offence for drone misuse; instead, the bloc relies on a patchwork of national laws. Meanwhile, the barriers to entry for criminals keep falling. Batteries, motors, communication links and navigation software can be bought online. Skilled engineers, some of them veterans of Ukraine’s front lines, are available for hire.
Europe must not stumble down a path towards widespread criminal use of drones. Countering crime by drone will require a layered response, technical, legal and forensic. Soft defences such as jamming, radar and signal detection must be matched with hard measures: interceptor drones, shotguns, laser and directed-energy systems.
Regulation must extend beyond pilots to the supply chain; engines, firmware, and even the workshops assembling hybrid craft from 3-D-printed parts. The public needs to know the difference between legal and criminal uses, and be co-opted to report the latter. And forensic capacity is crucial: legislation is needed to ensure drone’s digital fingerprints linking it to its operators are traceable.
Above all, Europe needs a coherent strategy. Drone threats do not respect borders; neither should our responses. That means Europol, EASA and national law-enforcement agencies must cooperate, integrating airspace security with organised-crime intelligence, not treat them as separate universes. It also means engaging industry to secure commercial platforms, block supply chains that feed criminal hands, and close vulnerabilities that restrict digital forensics.
Drones are transforming modern warfare. Unless Europe acts now, they will soon transform organised crime too. The choice is between preparing intelligently, or being blindsided by crime.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
