Austria stands at a pivotal juncture as the far-right makes a historic leap. For the first time since World War II, the radical-right Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) has claimed victory in the national parliamentary elections, reflecting deeper shifts within its political landscape. Under Herbert Kickl’s leadership, the FPO has surpassed the legacy of Jörg Haider, a populist trailblazer in Western Europe who famously forged a coalition with the conservative Austrian People’s Party (OVP) in 2000. Kickl’s rise signals not just a political triumph, but a profound transformation of Austria’s right-wing movement, cementing the FPO’s influence on the national stage. This moment marks a reshaping of Austrian politics, with the far-right now a formidable force in the country’s democratic framework, challenging the status quo of European governance.
Austria’s recent election saw 74.9% of the electorate cast their ballots, a turnout that speaks to the weight of the moment. The far-right Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) emerged victorious with 29.2% of the vote, marking a seismic shift in the nation’s political fabric. Chancellor Karl Nehammer’s Austrian People’s Party (OVP) followed closely at 26.5%, while the once-dominant Social Democratic Party (SPO) secured a distant third with 21%. The liberal NEOS claimed 9%, and the Greens – The Green Alternative – rounded out the top five with 8%. These results mark the entry of just five political forces into the National Council, Austria’s lower house. The FPO’s surge, however, is the defining narrative of this election, a reflection of deeper currents reshaping Austrian democracy and signaling a new era of far-right ascendancy in Europe.
Austria’s National Council, with its 183 seats, has been reshaped by the far-right’s ascendancy. The Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) now commands 58 seats, placing them in a formidable position. The Conservatives follow with 52, while the Social Democrats take 41. The Liberals hold 17 seats, and the Greens, with just 15, bring up the rear. No party stands with a clear majority, leaving the political landscape fractured and ripe for coalition-building. While several alliances are possible, one intriguing – yet improbable- option would see all parties unite against the FPO under the leadership of the Austrian People’s Party (OVP). This fragmented outcome reflects the deepening polarization in Austria, where the rise of the far-right has unsettled traditional political alignments and left the country at a crossroads, contemplating the shape of its democratic future amid an increasingly volatile European landscape.
What began as a fringe movement in the 1950s, barely scraping 5% of the vote, The Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) has now emerged as Austria’s dominant political force. The FPO owes much of its evolution to Herbert Kickl, a figure long operating in the shadows before stepping into the spotlight. Kickl’s journey began as a speechwriter for Jörg Haider, crafting the populist messages that catapulted the party into relevance. By 2020, after a brief and scandal-marred stint in government alongside the Austrian People’s Party (OVP), Kickl became the FPO’s undisputed leader. His tenure as interior minister was marked by a controversial raid on Austria’s domestic intelligence service, an aggressive move that revealed his ambitions to dismantle alleged conservative deep-state structures. This boldness, however, has deepened the divide with the OVP. Chancellor Karl Nehammer, embodying this tension, has firmly ruled out any coalition with the FPO while Kickl remains at its helm.
Beneath the surface of Austria’s political rifts, the policies of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) and the Austrian People’s Party (OVP) reveal a surprising alignment. Both parties champion libertarian economics, advocating for low taxes and pro-business policies, even as the FPO postures as the defender of Austria’s white working class. The similarities don’t end there. On immigration and Islam, the OVP, particularly under Sebastian Kurz’s leadership from 2017 to 2020, co-opted many of the FPO’s hardline stances. Kurz’s OVP adopted the far-right’s anti-Muslim rhetoric, enacting controversial policies like the hijab ban and the closure of mosques, many of which were later overturned by courts.
Even after the collapse of the FPO-OVP coalition, the OVP persisted with these policies, this time in partnership with the Greens. While personal and political differences may prevent a formal partnership between the FPO and OVP, the policy overlap is undeniable. This convergence has reshaped Austria’s political landscape, creating a precarious balance between mainstream conservatism and far-right populism. The political chess game in Austria is entering a decisive phase, with the People’s Party (OVP) and Social Democrats (SPO) pursuing sharply divergent strategies. Chancellor Karl Nehammer and his OVP are biding their time, waiting for President Alexander Van der Bellen to give the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) leader Herbert Kickl the chance to form a government, knowing that Kickl’s likely failure could benefit them in the long run. The goal? To secure a more favorable coalition ahead of an anticipated electoral defeat in Styria. Meanwhile, the SPO is aiming to strengthen its hand with a good showing in the upcoming state election, but the FPO is already poised to claim victory in Styria – an unprecedented win that could further rattle the political landscape. Nehammer faces a dilemma: rejecting a coalition with the FPO might lead to backlash for ignoring the election results, but aligning with the far-right risks alienating moderates. Either way, instability looms. An OVP-SPO coalition could collapse quickly, forcing early elections that would only embolden the FPO to make an even bigger power grab. The stakes have never been higher for Austria’s fragile democracy.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
