Why Uzbekistan Needs a New Economic Approach: Inclusion of LGBTI People

M.V. Lee Badgett

Belgium (Brussels Morning newspaper) Spring in Samarkand returns flowering trees and vivid color to the ancient Silk Road trading post, along with some less traditional arrivals this year – officials from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). The theme of EBRD’s annual meeting in Samarkand is investing in resilience to promote economic stability and growth.

Modern bankers have new tools to use to encourage economic growth in Uzbekistan and other countries in Central Asia.  One of the least known but potentially powerful tools is promoting economic inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people (LGBTI)–a strategy increasingly embraced by global financial institutions, development banks, and multinational corporations.

LGBTI people face challenges to their full participation in economies everywhere, but the barriers are particularly high in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, the last two countries in Central Asia that criminalize homosexuality. Others in the region dropped those legal penalties for LGBT people after becoming independent from the Soviet Union.

In January, Singapore became the latest country to decriminalize, with the prime minister noting that gay people “contribute fully to Singapore” and acknowledging that their hopes of being respected and accepted are reasonable. This landmark legal change came after a 15 year compromise in which Singaporean legislators left the criminal law in place but agreed to not enforce it.

Unlike Singapore, though, Uzbekistan has been particularly aggressive in arresting, torturing, and incarcerating gay men. Police arrest and beat gay men because of the “sin” they are committing or for financial gain, demanding payments to hold back on releasing information to the men’s families or to the public. Gay men, their friends, and sometimes their families must pay bribes to be released from police custody. Social media vigilantes also target LGBTI people and allies for harassment and violence.

These examples of poor treatment help us see the connection between antigay laws and practices to the needs of Uzbekistan’s economy. The most immediate effect is on health, a vital aspect of what economists call human capital—the energy, skills, knowledge, and creativity that people can deploy in the economy. Beatings and other forms of violence can generate physical injuries as well as psychological damage, diminishing the human capital available to the economy.

In addition, human rights agencies report that Uzbek gay men have experienced forced anal examinations (considered by many to be a form of torture) and sometimes resort to suicide attempts. HIV clinics have even reported gay men to the government and police, discouraging people from getting the testing and treatment that will prolong their lives and prevent transmission of HIV.

Even those LGBTI people who haven’t yet had such experiences would logically fear such treatment if they were more open. Hiding one’s sexuality or gender identity might help avoid some harms of homophobia or transphobia, but global evidence shows that staying in the closet also contributes to psychological and physical health conditions. Overall, the research shows that violence, stigma, and discrimination make LGBTI people sick.

These are also conditions that make it hard to conduct surveys on what happens to LGBTI people in other parts of the economy. As a result, we have little research on how young LGBTI people survive their schooling in Uzbekistan, or on how much discrimination LGBTI people face in the workplace or other marketplaces. However, it is reasonable to think that LGBTI people are also vulnerable to maltreatment in those settings in Uzbekistan. Bullying, harassment, and discrimination also reduce the educational achievements and work productivity of LGBTI people, holding back Uzbekistan’s businesses and overall economy even more.

These forms of exclusion in education, health, and the workplace add up to a big drain on a country’s economy. Countries that have exclusionary LGBTI-related laws and public opinion have lower GDP per capitaStudies from other countries put the cost of anti-LGBT treatment at 1% or more of a country’s GDP.

recent study focusing on Uzbekistan

 points out that countries that have decriminalized homosexuality  have 4.5 times higher rates of  foreign direct investment (FDI) than countries that criminalize consensual same-sex relationships. That might be one reason why Uzbekistan has the lowest rate of FDI as a percentage of GDP in the Central Asia region. There is a strong correlation between LGBT+ inclusion and both the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index and the World Bank’s Human Capital Index. Attracting foreign investment is one of Uzbekistan’s economic priorities, along with expanding the market for its goods and services in other countries as well as local tourism.

One way the EBRD (and the World Bank and Asian Development Bank) can help Uzbekistan achieve those goals is to help bring Uzbekistan’s law and practice into alignment with human rights and with smart economic policy. Inclusion of LGBTI people—starting with eliminating the harmful abuse of gay men—and of other vulnerable groups is an important strategy for a resilient, thriving economy.

M. V. Lee Badgett is a professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and the author of The Economic Case for LGBT Equality: Why Fair and Equal Treatment Benefits Us All (Beacon Press).

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.
Share This Article
M. V. Lee Badgett is a professor of economics and served as director of the Center for Public Policy and Administration (now the School of Public Policy) from 2007-16. She is also a faculty codirector of the Center for Employment Equity at UMass Amherst and a distinguished scholar at the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy at UCLA’s School of Law.