Turkey (Brussels Morning) – In a move that has sent shockwaves through the international development community, the Trump administration has effectively dismantled the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by freezing nearly all foreign aid programs.
This decision has profound implications for developing and underdeveloped nations that have long relied on U.S. assistance for critical health, education, and infrastructure programs. But beyond the immediate humanitarian fallout, the decision raises long-term questions about the future of global aid, including whether the international assistance system can ever fully recover from this abrupt disruption.
For decades, USAID has been at the center of a complex and highly structured network of international aid, supporting programs in health, governance, disaster relief, and human rights across the world. Its operations have been deeply integrated into the global development ecosystem, working alongside UN agencies, NGOs, and local governments to provide stability in regions plagued by poverty, conflict, and natural disasters
By freezing USAID’s operations, the Trump administration has not just halted funding—it has disrupted an entire global network of aid workers, logistical supply chains, and financial partnerships that took decades to build. Even if a future administration restores aid flows, the damage may be irreversible.
Many of the local organizations that depended on USAID support will have already closed. International partnerships that relied on steady U.S. funding will have found alternative donors—or ceased operations entirely.
The shutdown raises a critical question: Can the global aid system ever return to its pre-Trump form, or has this decision permanently weakened America’s ability to be a leader in international assistance?
The immediate impact of the USAID freeze has been devastating. In sub-Saharan Africa, health clinics providing HIV treatment through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have shut down, leaving millions of people at risk of losing access to life-saving medications. Programs combating tuberculosis and malaria have also been suspended, increasing the likelihood of outbreaks.
As the world grapples with multiple, interconnected crises—including the fragile post-war reconstruction of Syria, the urgent humanitarian needs emerging in the aftermath of the Israel-Gaza ceasefire, and Ukraine’s ongoing battle for survival—the sudden withdrawal of U.S. assistance threatens to destabilize already volatile regions.
In Syria, where international donors are cautiously exploring reconstruction efforts, the absence of American support may create a vacuum for Russian and Iranian-backed initiatives to shape the country’s future in ways that counter Western interests.
Meanwhile, in Gaza, where humanitarian organizations are scrambling to address food shortages, medical emergencies, and mass displacement, the aid freeze exacerbates an already desperate situation, potentially fueling further radicalization and unrest.
In Turkey, USAID has played a crucial role in supporting human rights initiatives, particularly in the wake of the 2016 coup attempt and the subsequent crackdown on civil society.
Funding has supported independent media organizations, human rights monitoring groups, and refugee assistance programs, particularly for Syrian migrants. With the sudden suspension of aid, these organizations now face severe funding shortfalls, forcing many to scale back or shut down operations altogether.
One of the most vulnerable sectors is the independent media landscape in Turkey, which already struggles under heavy government restrictions. USAID-funded programs have provided critical financial and technical support to journalists reporting on human rights abuses, corruption, and governance issues. With the shutdown, these initiatives are now in limbo, further shrinking the space for independent reporting in an increasingly authoritarian environment.
Beyond the direct impact on aid recipients, the freeze has had devastating consequences for the aid workforce itself. Thousands of USAID employees—both American and foreign nationals—have been furloughed or laid off, while countless others working for partner organizations have found themselves suddenly unemployed
In Turkey, many civil society professionals, researchers, and journalists who relied on USAID-funded projects for their livelihoods now face an uncertain future. The abrupt loss of funding has forced NGOs to cut staff, end research projects, and cancel public outreach initiatives.
The impact is not just economic—many of these workers are highly specialized professionals whose expertise in human rights monitoring, policy research, and humanitarian aid cannot be easily replaced.
Perhaps the most profound consequence of this decision is the long-term uncertainty it has introduced into international aid. Even if USAID were to resume operations in the future, will international organizations, local NGOs, and foreign governments still trust the U.S. as a reliable partner?
The Trump administration’s freeze has made clear that American aid commitments can be overturned overnight, without warning. This may push many countries to seek alternative donors, such as China, Russia, or Gulf states, whose aid programs often come with heavy political strings attached and reinforce authoritarian influence.
This may push many countries to seek alternative donors, such as China, Russia, or Gulf states, whose aid programs often come with heavy political strings attached and reinforce authoritarian influence. Meanwhile, the European Union, which prioritizes human rights, democratic governance, and transparency in its aid programs, may emerge as a more reliable and principled partner for those seeking long-term stability and reform.
However, the EU alone is unlikely to fill the void left by USAID, as its aid programs operate on a different scale and with different strategic priorities. The sudden withdrawal of U.S. assistance leaves a gap too large for any single entity to replace, raising concerns about long-term funding uncertainties for critical humanitarian and development initiatives.
Moreover, the shutdown raises concerns about the future of the global development workforce. The mass layoffs triggered by the USAID freeze have forced thousands of aid professionals to seek employment elsewhere, often in unrelated sectors. Even if funding is restored, rebuilding the specialized workforce that supports humanitarian and development programs may take years—if it happens at all.
The Trump administration’s decision to halt USAID operations marks a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, with far-reaching consequences for developing nations, human rights initiatives, and the global aid system itself. While the immediate humanitarian impacts are severe, the longer-term damage may be even more profound.
The international aid sector has now been forced to confront a difficult reality: U.S. assistance can no longer be assumed to be a stable, long-term commitment.
By halting USAID funding, the U.S. not only weakens the global development infrastructure but also undermines its own strategic interests. Washington risks ceding influence in regions where it has historically played a stabilizing role, allowing authoritarian actors such as Russia, China, and Gulf states to fill the void—often with political conditions that entrench illiberal governance.
Beyond the immediate fallout, this decision sends a troubling message to both allies and adversaries: American commitments are no longer reliable. The issue at hand is no longer just about the efficient use of public funds—it is about the long-term credibility of U.S. global leadership.
As the world watches the fallout, one thing is clear: global development will never be the same again.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
