On January 20, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that temporarily shields TikTok from an impending ban, offering the popular social media platform a 75-day reprieve.
This step signals a sharp pivot in the contentious saga over TikTok, the Chinese-owned social media platform entangled in a bitter Sino-American dispute. Under the threat of being banned by January 19 unless sold to an American buyer, TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance, now has a fresh window to secure a deal.
In a move emblematic of his penchant for reshaping narratives, which has granted momentary relief to TikTok’s millions of U.S. users, Donald Trump declared his intention to suspend a law mandating that TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, sell its U.S. operations to American investors. Without such a buyout, the platform would face an outright ban within the United States.
This announcement, made on the eve of his inauguration, reflects Trump’s inclination to wield executive power as a tool for asserting control over high-stakes issues. His approach, unapologetically transactional and deeply personal, aimed to recast the situation in terms favorable to his leadership.
By intervening, Trump has positioned himself not merely as a participant but as the final arbiter of TikTok’s fate – solidifying his authority while stoking tensions between Washington and Beijing. It is, in many ways, a prelude to the combative tone likely to define his forthcoming term. Trump’s decision hints at a more personal connection to the platform.
I guess I have a warm spot for TikTok,
he remarked, a comment that has both puzzled and entertained those following the ongoing geopolitical drama. Earlier that day, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew had attended Trump’s inauguration, sitting among a crowd of tech titans – a subtle but significant gesture in the tug-of-war between the political realm and the tech world.
Ironically, in 2020, President Donald Trump took aim at the growing influence of Chinese tech companies with executive orders that sought to ban transactions involving ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, and WeChat, the Chinese messaging app. While courts ultimately blocked these orders, the issue lingered on.
Less than a year ago, Congress passed sweeping legislation, citing national security concerns, mandating TikTok’s divestiture unless ByteDance found an approved U.S. buyer. TikTok’s success lies in its groundbreaking algorithm, which tailors short-form video recommendations to user behavior.
However, its meteoric rise has been shadowed by long-standing fears about its alleged role as a tool for Beijing’s surveillance and manipulation. These concerns, particularly over data security and espionage, surfaced well before Trump’s presidency and have only intensified as the platform’s influence has grown.
This ongoing saga highlights the complex intersection of technology, social media, and national security in the modern age. Trump’s decisions reflect not only the escalating tensions between Washington and Beijing but also the expanding debates about the role of tech companies in our lives. Interestingly, Trump himself leveraged social media adeptly, using platforms like TikTok to shape political discourse and enhance his electoral appeal, underscoring the paradox at the heart of the debate over TikTok.
Since joining TikTok last year, Trump has amassed nearly 15 million followers, a testament to the platform’s influence. He has openly credited it with helping him gain significant traction among younger voters, tapping into the app’s viral power to amplify his political reach.
In many ways, the TikTok dispute encapsulates the broader geopolitical tug-of-war between China and the U.S., where economic power and national security concerns collide in the digital age.
For months, it seemed unthinkable that Beijing would ever allow the sale of TikTok. The app had become a symbol of China’s defiance against what it sees as the West’s penchant for economic bullying.
TikTok emerged as one of the key issues during the recent phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. While the specifics of the conversation remain unclear, the very fact that it was broached signals the growing complexity of the dispute.
Trump, ever the dealmaker, further announced that he was looking to have the U.S. government broker a deal granting America 50% control of the social media platform. “Every rich person has called me about acquiring TikTok,” Trump claimed, emphasizing the potential value of the deal.
I think the U.S. should be entitled to get half of TikTok,
he said, adding,
It could be worth $500 billion.
Despite the inflated numbers, Trump was clear: without a U.S. buyer, TikTok’s future in the States is “worthless.”
Trump’s maneuver to grant TikTok additional time to secure a buyer reveals his strategic use of the platform as a bargaining chip. Whether for future dealings with Xi Jinping’s China – already a subject of his discussions – or to cultivate goodwill among potential buyers who might owe him their success, the decision fits neatly into Trump’s transactional approach to politics. It underscores a familiar pattern: bending institutions to serve personal or political ends while sidestepping established norms, including the separation of powers.
The justification offered was, as always, theatrical:
Americans deserve to see our exciting inauguration on Monday,
Trump proclaimed, implying that the app’s survival was somehow tied to national celebrations rather than pressing security concerns. What matters now, he hinted, is ensuring the platform ends up in “good hands”—a euphemism for allies or entities aligned with his interests.
As a matter of fact, to date, no evidence has been publicly presented to confirm allegations that TikTok has misused user data or manipulated its algorithm to benefit Beijing. This is perhaps the trickiest part of the whole saga, which may bother Trump in the coming days.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
