The quest for ethical AI: UN Resolution and European AI Act lead the way

Imran Khalid
3D rendering artificial intelligence AI research of robot and cyborg development for future of people living. Digital data mining and machine learning technology design for computer brain.

Belgium (Brussels Morning Newspaper), The recent unanimous adoption of the first-ever global resolution on artificial intelligence (AI) by the United Nations General Assembly marks a watershed moment in international efforts to regulate and harness the potential of AI technology. Spearheaded by the United States and co-sponsored by China and over 120 other nations, the resolution underscores a collective commitment to safeguarding human rights, protecting personal data, and mitigating risks associated with AI deployment.

While the resolution is nonbinding and lacks enforceability, it represents a significant step towards shaping the responsible development of AI amidst growing concerns about its potential societal impacts. With the rapid advancement of AI technology, there are mounting fears that it could disrupt democratic processes, facilitate fraudulent activities, and exacerbate job displacement. In this context, the resolution’s emphasis on strengthening privacy policies and monitoring AI risks reflects a concerted effort by governments worldwide to address these challenges and ensure that AI development proceeds in a manner that prioritizes the welfare and rights of individuals.

In a parallel but very encouraging development on the same matter, on March 13, the European Parliament also approved the Artificial Intelligence Act, heralding a landmark moment in the global regulation of AI. Representing the world’s first comprehensive legislation on the legal aspects of AI, the act sets forth EU-wide regulations concerning data quality, transparency, human oversight, and accountability.

Applicable to all providers and developers of AI systems marketed or used within the EU, irrespective of their geographic location, the law is poised to influence AI usage beyond the bloc, including in the United States. Notably, the act introduces punitive measures for violations, with fines calculated as a percentage of global annual AI-generated revenue. However, proponents argue that rather than stifling innovation, the legislation will spur it forward, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises that will increasingly adopt AI techniques. By fostering a regulatory environment that balances innovation with accountability, the European AI law sets a precedent for responsible AI development on a global scale.

The European AI Act has elicited diverse reactions, reflecting the complex landscape of AI regulation. While human rights groups have criticized the Act, citing concessions to industry lobbying and loopholes in prohibitions. Impactful and wide-ranging, the European AI Act extends its influence beyond the EU’s borders, compelling American companies to comply with its regulations. The absence of federal legislation in the United States will leave them with no choice but to adhere to European law, necessitating costly and time-consuming reviews of AI systems for compliance.

Amidst this regulatory landscape, reliance on state laws in the US would be short-sighted, highlighting the need for comprehensive federal legislation. In this context, Europe emerges as a frontrunner in AI governance, offering a model for responsible AI use globally. By setting stringent standards and regulations, the European AI Act provides a framework for ethical AI deployment, ensuring accountability and safeguarding against potential harms.The European initiative stands as a beacon of progress in navigating the complexities of the AI age.

While Europe has taken the lead in adopting regulatory frameworks for AI oversight, the United States has faced challenges in navigating its polarized political landscape to enact similar regulations. Despite efforts by the Biden administration to push for AI regulation, progress has been limited due to partisan gridlock in Congress. In the absence of comprehensive legislation, the White House has sought to address AI risks through executive action, bolstering national security and safeguarding consumers, workers and minorities.

However, encouragingly, the UN resolution aims to bridge the digital divide between developed and developing countries, ensuring that all nations have access to AI technology and capabilities. This inclusive approach seeks to empower developing countries to harness the benefits of AI for various applications, from disease detection to agricultural innovation and workforce development. The recent resolution underscores the swift progress of AI and underscores the critical need for global accord on safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems.

It acknowledges the evolving nature of AI governance, calling for continued dialogue on governance strategies. Importantly, it highlights the symbiotic relationship between innovation and regulation, dispelling the notion that they are diametrically opposed. This nuanced approach recognizes that effective regulation can foster innovation while safeguarding against potential risks, ensuring that AI development aligns with the broader goals of safety, security and trustworthiness on a global scale. The establishment of global technical standards will serve as a crucial linchpin for unlocking the full potential of this transformative technology while mitigating potential risks.

These standards, spanning safety, interoperability and ethical compliance, form the cornerstone of AI’s future trajectory. They will provide a framework for seamless interaction across borders and industries, fostering innovation and inclusivity. Furthermore, ethical standards safeguard against biases and privacy infringements, ensuring that AI advancements uphold societal values. By adhering to this comprehensive framework, AI systems can transcend mere technological prowess to become drivers of positive social change and universal progress. The adoption of robust global standards is imperative for shaping an AI landscape that is not only cutting-edge but also ethically sound and universally beneficial.

In tandem with the intricate technical architecture lies the imperative for a governance framework that mirrors the complexity of the global arena. This framework should transcend unilateral approaches and instead embrace a multipolar perspective, acknowledging the diverse cultural contexts and developmental trajectories of nations worldwide. Inclusivity is paramount to ensuring that AI development transcends elitism and becomes a collective global pursuit. By integrating varied perspectives and honoring the unique contributions of different cultures, we can chart a course towards AI development that serves the interests of all humanity. This approach not only fosters technological innovation but also upholds the shared human desire for peaceful progress that underpins sustainable development. Therefore, shaping the future of AI necessitates a dual commitment: one to stringent technical standards and another to a governance model that embraces the diverse global tapestry of perspectives, thus fostering the equitable advancement of this groundbreaking technology.



Dear reader,

Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our ownAs always, we remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.Sincerely, The Brussels Morning Team

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.
Share This Article
Imran Khalid is a reelance columnist on international affairs and I have been regularly contributing articles on international l affairs to some of the prestigious publications including the South China Morning Post, the Korea Times, the Jakarta Post, the New Straits Times (Malaysia), the Daily Sabah (Turkiye),the New Age (Bangladesh),the Oman Observer, the Guardian (Nigeria), the Ceylon Today (Sri Lanka) , the Geopolitical Monitor, the Manila Times, the AJU Business Daily and Mail & Guardian (South Africa) etc. He is based in Karachi, Pakistan.