Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Monday, May 16, 2022
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home In Depth The American Angle

Overturning Roe v. Wade Will Polarize the US Even More

Lincoln Mitchell by Lincoln Mitchell
5 May 2022
in The American Angle
Facade,Of,Us,Supreme,Court,In,Washington,Dc,On,Sunny

Facade of US Supreme court in Washington DC on sunny day

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The USA, (Brussels Morning Newspaper) Earlier this week a draft decision from the Supreme Court, indicating that the highest court in the US is preparing to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal, was leaked. This development is both completely unsurprising because the Republican Party has long promised its supporters that as soon as they had the votes on the Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade would be scrapped. On the other hand, this development is very surprising because Supreme Court decisions are almost never leaked.

The fallout from the inevitable reversal of Roe v. Wade will be complex and will not simply ban abortion in the US. Rather, this decision will mean each state can set its own abortion policy. Many conservative states, like Idaho and Oklahoma, already have laws on the books that would make abortion illegal as soon as Roe v. Wade is no longer the law of the land; other similarly conservative states will almost immediately pass laws that criminalize abortion. On the other hand, more liberal states like California, New York, Massachusetts, or Hawaii will immediately have laws legalizing abortion. According to some estimates, when the dust settles a substantial majority of American women will live in states where abortion is effectively illegal. Functionally, this means that women in liberal states, as well as affluent women in conservative states who can afford to travel out of state, will still have access to abortion. The women who will not have access to abortions will be lower-income women in conservative states, who will be disproportionately African American and Latino.   

Thus, in the aftermath of overturning Roe v. Wade, the distinctions between conservative and progressive America will deepen. Anti-abortion laws will be passed in the same states that are successfully legislating what teachers can say, do and teach in the classroom, where LGBTQ Americans generally have fewer rights, the carceral state is still strong and barriers to voting for people of color are being strengthened. In short, this Supreme Court decision will accelerate the US into becoming a divided country with one segment living in a modern progressive legal and regulatory framework while at least a third, and perhaps as much as half, will live in a much more conservative, almost theocratic, country.

There is precedent for the US to be segmented in this way-and overcoming that segmentation was essential for the consolidation of American democracy. Until the passage of important national civil rights legislation in the mid-1960s, the US was, with regards to racial equality, to a great extent two different countries. In the north, racism was always present and permeated governance, but in much of the south legal segregation that amounted to apartheid-like conditions prevailed as African Americans could not vote, were forced to attend poorly funded segregated schools, and were excluded from many public spaces. African Americans in the north had basic democratic rights, while those in the south did not.

In addition to reversing a hard-won right to reproductive freedom for American women and creating substantial barriers to millions of Americans should they need an abortion, overturning Roe v. Wade will return the US to these kinds of profound societal and legal differences between two groups of states. Therefore, this Supreme Court decision will also raise the big picture question of whether the US can continue to function as a unified polity. A country where basic rights ranging from reproductive freedom to equal access to the franchise vary significantly depending on the part of the country is, in some meaningful sense, already not a unified state. A country where only some people enjoy full democratic rights and freedom from oppressive religious fanaticism cannot be fully free nor democratic-but this clearly the direction in which we are heading.

Apologists for a system that denies some Americans basic rights while granting those rights to others who happen to live in another state may rabbit on about federalism and the genius of the founders, but that falls short of rigorous analysis. A system where a lower-income African American woman in California has access to abortion and the franchise, while a similar woman in Texas or Alabama faces obstacles to both does not reflect anybody’s genius, only the bigotries of some voters and some legislators.

As the two different legislative and regulatory America take shape, the political and economic differences between the two America’s will deepen, exacerbating already troublingly deep political polarization in the US. Additionally, those Americans who have the means will increasingly make decisions about where they want to study, work, and build a life based on which vision of the US they support which, in turn, will intensify the polarization even more. The question of whether or not an already frayed social and political fabric in the US can survive this is an open one.

Tags: Main-SliderOpinion sectionSupreme Court

Latest post

Launch,of,the new European-Parliament,logo

European Parliament look ahead — Ukraine, Fit for 55, digital single market, Moldova

8 hours ago
Overturning Roe v. Wade Will Reveal Our Flawed Constitution

Overturning Roe v. Wade Will Reveal Our Flawed Constitution

2 days ago

Most Read

  • shutterstock_1821616664

    MEPs send Open Letter urging the Home Secretary Priti Patel to reject Assange’s extradition

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • These are the 10 highest paying jobs in the Europe in 2022

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Brussels residents want to set up school for Ukrainian children

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why corruption matters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Sweden: Taking Syrian children away from parents for protection?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • EU Institutions
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Member States
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Print Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT