Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Tuesday, October 3, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

EU Parliament Shouldn’t Hand European Justice to the Secretive Litigation Finance Industry

Harold Kim by Harold Kim
22 February 2022
in Opinion
Judges,Wooden,Gavel,With,Eu,Flag,In,The,Background.
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Belgium (Brussels Morning Newspaper) The European Parliament faces a crossroads: should it hand over control of the EU’s lawsuit system to an obscure but enormous industry known as third party litigation funding (TPLF)? The stakes are huge, both financially and for the integrity of the European judicial system.  

 Many people have never even heard of TPLF, which is by design. Unbeknownst to the public, judges, and often the parties to the lawsuits themselves, these financial institutions back litigation efforts in return for a portion of any award or settlement. Litigation funders structure their agreements, which are kept secret, to allow them greater control over strategic decisions in the case, including making sure they are paid first. Funders can back out of the case if it no longer seems lucrative enough.  

TPLF is a fast-growing, multibillion-Euro industry in Europe, yet it is mostly unregulated, unlike any other financial institutions. Funders are also not bound by any of the standards that legal professionals must abide by, such as acting in the best interests of the claimants or paying the legal costs of the case should they lose. Instead, because funders must be paid first from any award or settlement, claimants can be left with little to nothing.     

Seeking to maximize profits and minimize risk is a reasonable strategy for a financial investor. But the legal system is not a financial market. It is not an arbitrage play for hedge funds. It exists to deliver justice for victims and consumers, not fat returns for lawyers and funders.  

Yet because these lawsuits can be lucrative, unregulated third-party litigation funding has taken root worldwide. 

In Australia, for instance, almost half of the federal class actions brought between 2014 and 2020 were funded by TPLF. The Australian Parliament found that third-party funded litigation can “generate investment returns unheard of in any other jurisdiction — in some cases of more than 500 percent.” They said claimants were the “biggest losers” in funded class actions.  

That’s the future of European justice if outside funders are not reined in. The TPLF industry grew by 40% in the EU between 2009 and 2019. According to the European Parliamentary Research Service, it is projected to grow even faster this decade, potentially doubling in size over the next five years.

In the EU, the public wants protection against the worst abuses of this industry. In a recent survey of 5,000 European consumers, 83% said they want regulatory safeguards.

Тhankfully, the EU can now show the rest of the world how to handle this problematic industry. The European Parliament is considering several safeguards to ensure consumers have access to justice and pull the funding industry out of the shadows. These common-sense reforms include ensuring funders have the capital to see a case through to the end and that they will cover the costs of the case should their side lose. Another key safeguard would prohibit funders from controlling the course of litigation and be transparent about any agreements with the lawyers that could present a conflict of interest.  

One critical safeguard before the Parliament would require funding agreements to be reviewed and disclosed to all parties in a lawsuit. Disclosure would bring much-needed transparency to an industry that actively does not want anyone to know what they are doing.  

Protecting claimants and the integrity of the legal system from this secretive industry must be a priority for the Parliament. Letting litigation funders control lawsuits, dodge paying for costs of the lawsuits they lose, and avoid accountability for conflicts of interest puts claimants last and lawyers and funders first.  

This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the EU to take control of the situation before litigation funding runs rampant. They should take it.  

Tags: European JusticeMain-SliderOpinion sectionU.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform
Follow Brussels Morning
Facebook Twitter Youtube Linkedin

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

More Info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Categories

  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Culture and Society
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Parliament
  • Europe
  • Features
  • Health & Fitness
  • In Depth
  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Member States
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Uncategorised
  • World
  • Diplomacy
  • Middle East Eye
  • US Elections
  • Join Our Newsletter

    Brussels Morning Newspaper – All Rights Reserved © 2020

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Brussels Bubble
      • Parliament
      • Commission
      • Council
    • Wider Europe
      • Member States
    • World
    • Business & Society
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Culture & Society
    • Policy Talks
      • Place de la Bourse
      • The Macro-Economist
      • Sustainable Perspective
      • Ambassador’s Corner
      • The American Angle
      • Southeast Europe
    • Print Magazine

    Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT