The British-Dutch multinational business Unilever owns the Vaseline brand, which is not an Israeli company. Nonetheless, Unilever imports and distributes Vaseline locally in Israel through its subsidiary Unilever Israel. Vaseline is a famous skin product with the best results, but people are confused about:
Does Vaseline support Israel? Unilever Israel indirectly supports the Israeli government by paying large business taxes in Israel.
Additionally, Unilever Israel works with distributors such as SodaStream, a West Bank-based business that is the target of boycott efforts. Due to its affiliation with Unilever, Vaseline is indirectly associated with Israel through corporate taxes and distribution routes, even though the product itself is not manufactured in Israel.
Vaseline’s corporate ownership
Because Unilever is listed on the London, Amsterdam, and New York stock exchanges, its corporate ownership is extremely diverse. Large institutional investors like Vanguard and BlackRock own about 80–85% of its shares, with retail and other investors holding the remaining portion. An appointed board and senior leadership team oversee governance, and no one organization or family owns a majority share.
In 1930, British Lever Brothers and Dutch Margarine Unie merged to form Unilever, which in 1987 purchased Vaseline through Chesebrough-Ponds. The holding structure functions as a single company with a single set of directors and has offices in Rotterdam and London in addition to dual listings.
Unilever’s operations in Israel
With local employees and decades of market investment, Unilever has a sizable corporate presence in Israel. Despite criticism over its subsidiary Ben & Jerry’s attempt to stop selling in Israeli-occupied territories, the company has publicly reaffirmed its intention to stay in Israel. To maintain product availability in Israel and the West Bank, Unilever eventually sold the Israeli Ben & Jerry’s company to a regional licensee.
Because Unilever continues to operate in Israel, it is subject to Israeli corporate taxes and is part of the Israeli economy, which is a major issue for boycott activists. While some boycott campaigners focus on Unilever’s relationships with particular subsidiaries and their views regarding Israeli settlements, others target the company’s operations within Israel and its supply and distribution chains.
The controversy: Unilever’s ties to SodaStream and West Bank operations
In the occupied West Bank, in the Israeli settlement of Mishor Adumim, SodaStream ran a manufacturing plant. Because of SodaStream’s alleged mistreatment of Palestinian workers and its role in settlement expansion, activists boycotted the company.
Following intense boycott pressure, SodaStream shut down its West Bank production but reopened in the Naqab desert, where comparable human rights issues still exist. In Israel, Unilever Israel has used SodaStream’s platforms to promote products like Vaseline.
Due to SodaStream’s alleged continued involvement in the eviction and abuse of Palestinian and Bedouin laborers, the boycott is still in effect. Compared to Israeli employees, Palestinian laborers claimed to have poorer working conditions and lower pay.
How do Vaseline’s profits indirectly support Israeli state policies?
Since Unilever Israel, the company that imports and distributes Vaseline, is a registered business that operates directly within Israel, the company’s profits indirectly support Israeli state programs. This is how the procedure operates:
- Selling Vaseline and other products in the Israeli market brings significant money for Unilever Israel.
- The business pays corporate taxes in Israel, which go toward funding the government.
- Like other corporate tax income, these funds support public services, infrastructure, and state initiatives in Israel.
- Israel’s economic might and international network of business partnerships are strengthened by Unilever’s operations.
According to some campaigners, boycotting Vaseline and other Unilever products is advised because of this indirect financial assistance.
Why do activists target Unilever and not Vaseline directly?
Since Unilever is the parent corporation, activists target Unilever rather than Vaseline. It makes all significant business and moral decisions and owns Vaseline. Activists contend that Unilever is ultimately accountable for business practices. The business is well-known in the media and has a global reach. By focusing on it, you may increase the impact and draw more attention. Activists can simultaneously affect other products, not only Vaseline, by applying pressure to Unilever.
Public criticism has a greater impact on Unilever’s reputation because the company also positions itself as socially conscious. Many customers are unaware that Unilever owns Vaseline. By focusing on the parent company, awareness of these relationships is increased. To put it briefly, protestors target Unilever because it is the company that actually controls Vaseline’s business practices.
How can consumers make informed choices and push for corporate change?
By becoming conscious, picky, and vocal about their purchases, consumers may make educated judgments and advocate for corporate reform. Research and awareness are the first steps. Consumers ought to be informed about the origins of goods, brand ownership, and ethical business practices. Customers can learn more about a brand’s actual impact by reading ingredient lists, looking for cruelty-free or fair-trade certifications, and following reputable watchdog groups.
Supporting businesses that are transparent, sustainable, and ethical sends a strong statement to the market. Businesses take notice when enough customers change their purchasing habits. People can also use social media to spread information, create awareness, and inspire group action. Public reviews, petitions, and boycotts can all put pressure on companies to alter their detrimental practices.
Customers can also write to businesses directly to request environmental improvements, cruelty-free testing, or improved labor standards. Reliance on multinational businesses can be decreased by promoting ethical, small-scale, and local producers. In the end, each purchase serves as a vote for the business conduct that consumers desire. Long-term reform and true corporate accountability may be fueled by informed and united customers.
Navigating ethics in consumer choices for skincare
Making ethical skincare decisions as a customer can be difficult yet profoundly significant. Because of the size of the skincare market, not all companies are open about their labor, production, or sourcing policies. Understanding the meaning behind the label is the first step towards ethical consumption. Customers ought to seek out vegan, cruelty-free, and ecologically conscious brands. Ethical standards can be confirmed by looking for certificates such as Leaping Bunny, Fair Trade, or B Corp.
A company’s ownership and political affiliations should also be taken into account. Some brands with an ethical appearance are controlled by bigger companies that engage in dubious activities. Customers can make well-informed decisions by researching parent firms. Sustainability and packaging are other important considerations; companies that utilize recyclable materials and steer clear of excessive plastic show that they care about the environment.
Accessibility and cost might make moral decisions challenging, yet even little actions count. Positive change is facilitated by sharing ethical options with others, buying less but better, and supporting independent and local brands. Making thoughtful choices that balance responsibility and beauty is more important than aiming for perfection when it comes to skincare ethics.
Vaseline does not openly express any kind of direct support for Israel. Nonetheless, it is owned by Unilever, a global corporation with operations in Israel that has come under fire from boycott campaigns and activists. Ben & Jerry’s, once owned by Unilever, became a major source of controversy due to sales in Israeli settlements. Despite not having a political position or taking any action on Israel, Vaseline is indirectly connected to these discussions because of its affiliation with Unilever.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
