Pakistan is at a critical juncture, where both its political and economic systems are under strain. While many factors have contributed to the current state of instability, a significant part of the challenge lies in the military’s longstanding influence over the country’s governance. This influence, though historically justified by national security concerns, has complicated the path to democratic consolidation and economic reform.
For decades, the military has played an outsized role in Pakistan’s political life. From shaping electoral outcomes to influencing judicial proceedings, the armed forces have maintained a position of power that often surpasses civilian authority. While their role in ensuring national security cannot be understated, the lines between security concerns and governance have blurred, leading to a system where civilian institutions struggle to assert their independence.
The judiciary, for instance, has faced increasing challenges in maintaining its autonomy. Allegations of coercion and surveillance aimed at high-ranking judges have created an environment where justice is seen as vulnerable to external pressures. This undermines public confidence in one of the country’s most crucial democratic institutions. While the judiciary should serve as a check on executive and legislative power, its perceived subjugation has weakened its ability to perform this role effectively.
Economically, Pakistan has found itself in a cycle of dependency on international financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The need for repeated bailouts reflects deep-seated structural issues in the country’s economy, which have been exacerbated by a lack of long-term planning and heavy defense expenditures. The military, with its significant share of the national budget, plays a central role in how resources are allocated. While defense spending is vital for national security, there is growing concern that disproportionate military expenditures have come at the expense of essential areas like education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) is a case in point. The airline, once a national symbol of pride, is now burdened with debt and on the verge of privatization. Mismanagement, coupled with a lack of transparency, has led to its downfall, raising questions about the role of various stakeholders, including those from military circles who have been involved in its operations. This is just one example of how national assets have been allowed to deteriorate, while governance structures remain opaque.
Politically, the military’s involvement in civilian matters has long been a contentious issue. Though not always visible, the military’s influence in decision-making has shaped the trajectory of Pakistan’s democracy. Civilian governments have often operated under the shadow of military leadership, with key decisions being influenced behind the scenes. While this arrangement has provided a semblance of stability at times, it has also hampered the development of a fully functional and independent civilian government. Political parties, regardless of their mandate, have found it difficult to govern without deference to military preferences.
In this context, Pakistan’s repeated recourse to IMF bailouts serves as a reminder of the economic limitations imposed by this model of governance. The focus on defense and security, while important, has overshadowed critical areas of reform needed to ensure sustainable economic growth. Without addressing these structural imbalances, Pakistan will continue to face economic hardships, furthering its dependency on foreign aid and external loans.
The military’s role in shaping Pakistan’s future must now be reconsidered. While their contributions to national security are undeniable, it is crucial that civilian institutions are allowed to function independently and that military influence is confined to its constitutionally mandated role. A healthy democracy requires that all branches of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—operate without undue influence. This includes ensuring that civilian leaders are empowered to make decisions in the best interest of the people, rather than navigating the delicate balance of military expectations.
Economic reforms, too, will require a shift in priorities. Pakistan’s defense needs must be balanced with the pressing demands of its economy. Investment in human development, infrastructure, and industry is essential to creating a stable, self-sufficient economy. This cannot be achieved if defense continues to consume an outsized portion of the national budget. The country’s economic planners and political leaders must work towards a more balanced allocation of resources, one that addresses both security concerns and the long-term welfare of the people.
The path forward for Pakistan lies in empowering civilian institutions and fostering a governance model where the military supports rather than dictates the political process. This does not mean sidelining the armed forces but rather encouraging a partnership where each institution respects the boundaries of its role. A balanced approach, where civilian leadership is given the space to govern while the military focuses on national security, will be key to building a stable and prosperous Pakistan.
Ultimately, the future of Pakistan depends on its ability to strengthen its democratic foundations. This requires difficult but necessary conversations about the role of the military in politics and governance. Only through a genuine commitment to democratic values, economic reform, and institutional accountability can Pakistan hope to overcome its current challenges and build a future where the needs of the people come first.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
