There has been turmoil and civil crisis due to ongoing genocide in Gaza, Southern Lebanon, and the Syrian regime fall. The US administration has played a key role in failing to reach diplomacy and deploying weapons to support its alliance.
Geopolitical implications of the war in Syria are split over
There is a specific question that will cause a side effect relationship. How will the Assad regime create the possibility of turbulence in the region? As we have seen, Erdogan’s public speech opened new interest in Ankara! This evokes the need to take emergency action from Turkey’s leadership positions in the Middle East. Showing the West and NATO that Turkey’s historic empire will dictate the next decades. Firstly, establish the Syrian government. What to do with Rebels in Syria?
How can Turkey’s alliances manage refugee situations? The European Commission will propose this open question. Can people be provided with safety when returning home? This will raise many concerns among the international community to try to avoid another Syrian crisis. Will this lead to the Turkey Kurdish government’s taking over the catastrophic situation?
Civil war, genocide, religious ideological conflict will be highlighting
The possibility of this splitting between the regions of Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon remains an open question. Who will counterbalance the conflict crisis between the communities in the Middle East remains an open question. The dynamic relationship between Russia and Iran shows new possible events for US allies since the Iranian regime has become weakened due to the ongoing conflict with Israel. Hezbollah and its proxies will start doubting Iran’s ability to defend itself since the fall of the Syrian government. This will lead to an inevitable new outcome that can successfully result in the US robbing the Israeli force and taking action on the ground.
There will not certainly be a legal obligation to push the administration to rebuild and establish peace policies. The implications are specific regarding the security sector: imposed open dialogues for the continuation of the Israeli government’s failure to manage terrorism in Lebanon with Hezbollah and Gaza with Hamas. In an interview with the private DemocratTV channel, Yaalon said,
“The road we are being led down is conquest, annexation, and ethnic cleansing.”
Open questions for peace, self-determination, and civil protection of people in Gaza will be denied, and therefore, accountability will not be taken.
The prevailing Jihadist rebellion managing peace in a region led by Turkey will be a beneficial option for US-Israeli-led forces. It’s evidence that the US shows interest in dealing with Syria and other neighboring countries. Highlighting
This is a region of winding instability;” The result, in my opinion, is that US and Israeli policies deliberately overthrown one government gap to another, and it’s left a waisted—massive zone instability.”
Interested in the oil industry and continued wars in Ukraine
When discussing how global actors deploy stronger alliances, it is essential to consider major Russian oil companies Rosneft, Gazprom, and Lukoil: the last lasting war and Ukraine’s European dependency on Russian gas-shaped foreign policies. Therefore, when the Assad alliance in Syria fell, it completely demolished Russian troops taking action. This has led the US to focus on the major treasure: Sryaina oil and natural resources. Since the Russians are out, there has been no danger.
“So they say, ‘Trump’s in Syria,’ I didn’t pull out—I did pull out,”
the president continued.
“We have the oil, really secure. We’ll see what happens with it.”
This statement allows readers to interpret the
US forms of interest as directly engaging in the ongoing conflict without withdrawing forces from northern Syria and helping the Israelis settle the political relations that can take Syian.
On one side, we have the Turkish-Kurdish government and the US-Israeli forces.
Stronger alliances such as Iran and Russia have been pushed out; This will be a game changer.
What will the next step, good geopolitical strategy, and economic interest?
The big question that will be proposed to President Trump is: Can the US ground accomplish its desire in the Middle East, and what should we expect in the next election in 2025?
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
