As the EU and China convene this month to settle critical trade negotiations around electric vehicles, the stakes extend beyond mere economic manoeuvring; these discussions could recalibrate the global automotive sector itself. At the heart of this is the United States’ growing isolationist stance, exemplified by its restrictive policies against China’s connected vehicles – a calculated move to freeze out Chinese supply chains in smart automotive technology. The U.S. has already placed hefty tariffs on China’s new energy vehicles, and it now seeks to leverage its allies, urging Europe to follow suit. Yet this approach comes at a cost, first and foremost to American industry. Major U.S. automakers like Ford and General Motors may face prohibitions on importing China-made models, while Tesla has avoided export from China to dodge the mounting regulatory maze. Volvo, under Geely’s ownership, is now compelled to question its business operations in North America, potentially risking nearly a fifth of its revenue. Meanwhile, the U.S. auto market braces for reverberations in supply chains and diminished consumer choice.
What Washington characterizes as a protective measure is, in reality, a gamble that may jeopardize collaborative potential. The EU’s stance in these negotiations will shape the future of not just Chinese vehicles in Europe, but of a transatlantic automotive industry where trade wars are rising over collaboration. The question is not only if the EU will stand with the U.S. but if it can afford the consequences for its own auto sector amid these high-stakes global shifts. As the automotive industry pivots to electrification and intelligent technology, China’s supply chain has become a critical link in this global transformation. For numerous international automakers and top-tier suppliers, aligning with China has been more than strategic – it has been essential. Companies like Quectel Communications, Hesai Technology, Sunny Optical, and Will Semiconductor exemplify China’s competitive edge, a reality that hasn’t escaped Washington’s notice.
The United States is now signaling a long arm strategy, warning European and international auto suppliers to prepare for a broad supply chain overhaul. The message is clear: American impatience with its allies’ insufficient security standards won’t be ignored. Even before the connected car ban’s framework was publicized in late July, Washington had communicated its findings to partners, expecting detailed risk assessments and mitigation strategies to flow back across the Atlantic. For European automakers, who hold vast stakes in the Chinese market, these demands pose a stark dilemma. And while Japan and South Korea may be seen as more pliable in U.S. plans, European firms face a tangled reality where decoupling from China is neither straightforward nor economically sound. As the U.S. presses for compliance, Europe’s auto industry must weigh the heavy toll of aligning with an increasingly polarized U.S.-China stance. Looking ahead, global automakers face a stark choice as they redefine supply chains around the dual hubs of China and the United States.
On one side lies the U.S. push to isolate China from its networks, forging alliances focused on connected car technology without Chinese involvement. The alternative, however, leverages China’s cost-effective and innovative technology, opening vast markets beyond U.S. borders. For Washington, the stance of partners – particularly the EU – is pivotal. If the U.S. restriction on connected vehicles remains confined to North America, its domestic-focused supply chain could ultimately cover only about 21% of the global market. Meanwhile, a China-centered network spans a more expansive 34%, encompassing China, Russia, and beyond. In this unfolding landscape, the decisions made today by Europe and other key stakeholders will shape not just trade flows but the very architecture of tomorrow’s global automotive ecosystem.
Rhodium Group suggests that should partners choose neutrality, economies of scale could swiftly favor China’s competitiveness, leaving the United States struggling to secure the vast 45% of the open global market. In a worst-case scenario, North America could end up isolated, while the rest of the world builds on the cost-effective advantages of China’s supply chain. Historically, Japan and Germany held the mantle of top automobile exporters, with a reach far exceeding that of the U.S. Even today, China’s market size eclipses America’s, underscoring why EU and Japanese automakers, whose economies are tightly linked to the auto industry, may resist Washington’s push for a connected car ban. This U.S.-centric model, apart from Tesla’s rare self-sufficiency, has yet to demonstrate a robust “in America, for America” supply chain, making the likelihood of the ban’s impact largely confined to North America a pragmatic reality. This week, Qualcomm unveiled two cutting-edge automotive chips aimed at smart cockpits and intelligent driving, collaborating with its long-time ally Google. However, the partnership remains focused on enhancing the user experience rather than diving into full-scale autonomous vehicle production. The prevailing sentiment in the market suggests Google’s ambitions extend beyond merely supporting Android Auto; its advanced autonomous driving technology is poised to disrupt the industry.
Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers of smart driving solutions are forging ahead, aligning with global Tier 1 giants. Even as high tariffs challenge exports, vehicles linked to China’s supply chain maintain a distinct competitive edge. In this evolving landscape, China stands poised to shape the future of global automotive technology, redefining the balance of power.
The EU’s decisions will significantly shape the global automotive landscape, a reality that diverges sharply from the U.S. approach. While the United States leans towards aggressive trade restrictions, the EU’s strategy appears more nuanced, favoring conditional trade defenses to draw Chinese supply chains and technology patents into its fold. By imposing relatively modest tariffs on electric vehicles entering China, the EU could stimulate greenfield investments from Chinese automakers. However, the stakes are high. Should negotiations falter, a trade war could erupt, with the U.S. swiftly reinstating its ban on Chinese-connected vehicles. The pivotal question remains: will the EU align with the U.S. or pursue a more compatible path? For companies like German and Japanese automakers, along with General Motors and Tesla, this uncertainty could force them to adopt dual supply chains. They may find themselves navigating between China and the U.S., as they seek to maintain access to markets beyond these two economic powerhouses.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
