Halle (The Brussels Morning Newspaper) – October 10, 2026 – Halle Berry’s 18-year-old daughter, Nahla Aubry, has publicly defended her mother in a legal dispute involving allegations of child abuse made by Berry’s former husband, actor Olivier Martinez. In a declaration submitted to the Los Angeles Superior Court, Nahla said she had never witnessed her mother act violently towards anyone and described her as a loving, supportive and involved parent. Martinez has accused Berry of physically abusing their son, Maceo, and sought changes to their custody arrangements. Berry has denied the allegations, while the dispute remains subject to further court proceedings.
- What Did Nahla Aubry Say in Defence of Halle Berry?
- What Allegations Has Olivier Martinez Made Against Halle Berry?
- How Has Halle Berry Responded to the Abuse Allegations?
- What Role Does Nahla’s Declaration Play in the Custody Dispute?
- When Is the Next Court Hearing in Halle Berry’s Case?
- How Did Halle Berry and Olivier Martinez’s Custody Dispute Develop?
- What Is Known About the Temporary Restraining Order?
- Background: Halle Berry’s Family and Previous Custody Arrangements
What Did Nahla Aubry Say in Defence of Halle Berry?
Nahla Aubry, Berry’s daughter with Canadian model Gabriel Aubry, made her position clear in a court declaration submitted in connection with the dispute between Berry and Martinez. Her statement challenged allegations that her mother had physically harmed her younger half-brother, Maceo.
According to reporting by the Los Angeles Times, Nahla said she had never witnessed Berry behaving violently towards anyone. She also described her mother as someone who had consistently provided stability, support and guidance throughout her life.
Nahla said the allegations had left her shocked, sad and upset. She argued that the accusations did not reflect the values Berry had taught her while growing up.
In her declaration, Nahla also addressed the relationship between Berry and Maceo. She said she had lived with her younger brother for much of his life and had never seen her mother hit, slap, choke, grab or otherwise physically abuse him.
She acknowledged that Berry could be strict when necessary but characterised her as warm, supportive and closely involved in her children’s lives. Nahla also described occasions when her mother and Maceo had playfully wrestled or tickled one another while laughing.
Her account is relevant to the ongoing custody proceedings because it provides the court with her description of the family relationship. However, her statement represents her own observations and does not, by itself, determine the truth of the allegations made by either parent.
Nahla also expressed concern about the effect of the dispute on her younger brother and the family’s relationships. Her declaration has brought a member of Berry’s immediate family into a legal disagreement that had largely centred on statements from the former couple and their legal representatives.
What Allegations Has Olivier Martinez Made Against Halle Berry?
The dispute escalated after Martinez accused Berry of physically abusing their son during an incident on 26 September 2026. According to court documents described by the Los Angeles Times and other news organisations, Martinez alleged that Berry put her hands around Maceo’s neck and choked him during an altercation.
Martinez sought a restraining order and changes to the existing custody arrangements, arguing that the allegations warranted restrictions on Berry’s contact with their son. A judge granted a temporary restraining order, introducing restrictions while the case proceeds.
The precise details of the alleged incident remain disputed. Martinez’s account forms part of his court filing, while Berry has rejected the accusation. The allegations should therefore be distinguished from any findings a court may ultimately make.
Reports have also described wider disagreements between the former couple over parenting and their son’s upbringing. These include claims about their interactions with Maceo, communication between the parents and the way disagreements have affected their co-parenting arrangements.
Martinez has raised concerns about Berry’s conduct and has sought greater control over the arrangements for their son. Berry, in turn, has challenged his account and disputed the restrictions placed on her relationship with Maceo.
The legal dispute involves allegations from both sides, and neither parent’s public statements should be treated as an established judicial conclusion. The court proceedings are intended to address the competing claims and the arrangements considered appropriate for the child.
How Has Halle Berry Responded to the Abuse Allegations?
Berry has strongly denied Martinez’s accusations. In statements reported by entertainment and news organisations, the actress rejected the suggestion that she had abused her son and maintained that she would not deliberately harm him.
Her legal team has challenged Martinez’s account, describing the allegations as unfounded and disputing the characterisation of the incident. Berry has also presented herself as a survivor of domestic violence, arguing that the accusations against her do not accurately describe her conduct as a parent.
The actress has also sought to restore the shared custody arrangement established in an earlier agreement. Reporting by the Los Angeles Times and other outlets indicates that the latest dispute has developed against a background of disagreements over how the former couple should raise their son and make decisions about his welfare.
Berry’s response places the focus on both the disputed incident and the broader question of parenting arrangements. She disputes Martinez’s allegations, while Martinez maintains that his legal action is intended to protect their son.
The competing accounts have not yet produced a final resolution of the custody dispute. The temporary court restrictions and the forthcoming hearing form part of the legal process through which the allegations and the child’s circumstances may be considered.
Berry’s denial is an important part of the record, but it does not independently settle the allegations. Equally, the granting of a temporary restraining order should not be presented as a final determination that the alleged abuse occurred.
What Role Does Nahla’s Declaration Play in the Custody Dispute?
Nahla’s declaration adds her personal observations to the material reported in the ongoing case. As Berry’s eldest child and Maceo’s half-sister, she described her experience of living with her mother and her observations of the relationship between Berry and her younger brother.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Nahla said her mother had encouraged her children to maintain loving relationships with their fathers. She also stated that she had not heard Berry speak negatively about either of her children’s fathers in the way suggested by allegations raised in the dispute.
Her account also addressed allegations concerning an earlier dispute between Berry and Martinez. Nahla recalled an incident from her childhood involving Martinez and her father, Gabriel Aubry, in which she said she remembered Martinez beating Aubry.
The recollection refers to a reported confrontation between the two men in 2012. Nahla’s statement presents her memory of that event; it should not be treated as a new judicial finding about the current allegations against Berry.
Nahla also offered observations about Maceo’s behaviour and their relationship as siblings. She said she had spoken with him after the September incident and did not believe he appeared upset at that time. Her declaration further indicated that the temporary restrictions prevented her from contacting him.
These details reflect Nahla’s account of events and her concerns about the consequences of the legal dispute. They do not establish what happened during the alleged September incident, which remains contested by Berry and Martinez.
The declaration also illustrates how a custody dispute can involve wider family relationships when relatives provide statements about their experiences. The court’s consideration of such material remains separate from the public attention generated by the case.
When Is the Next Court Hearing in Halle Berry’s Case?
The next reported court hearing concerning the temporary restraining order is scheduled for 16 October 2026. News reports published earlier in October identified the hearing as the next significant date in the dispute. The proceedings are expected to address the restrictions and the parties’ competing positions regarding custody and contact with Maceo.
The temporary order has affected Berry’s ability to spend time with her son. Reports have described restrictions on contact pending further court consideration, although the precise terms and their application are matters governed by the court’s orders.
The hearing is significant to the immediate legal process because the current arrangements remain subject to judicial review. It provides an opportunity for the court to consider the matter further, but its eventual outcome should not be assumed in advance.
The parties have presented different accounts of the events that led to the application. Martinez has alleged that Berry physically harmed their son, while Berry has denied wrongdoing and challenged the allegations. Nahla’s declaration adds her own account of the family’s relationships to the material associated with the proceedings.
As the case continues, the distinction between allegations, responses and judicial findings remains important. The temporary order reflects an interim legal measure rather than a final ruling on the disputed claims.
How Did Halle Berry and Olivier Martinez’s Custody Dispute Develop?
Berry and Martinez met while working on the film Dark Tide and married in 2013. They have one son together, Maceo. Their marriage ended in divorce, and their subsequent relationship has included legal disagreements over parenting arrangements.
The former couple reached a custody agreement in 2023. However, subsequent reporting has described continuing difficulties over co-parenting and disagreements about decisions affecting their son. Berry has previously sought changes to custody arrangements, while the latest dispute has involved Martinez’s request for sole custody and the temporary restrictions imposed following his allegations.
Berry also has a daughter, Nahla, with her former partner Gabriel Aubry. Nahla’s declaration therefore addresses a family relationship that developed across separate households and parental relationships.
In her statement, Nahla described her mother as consistently supportive and said Berry had encouraged positive relationships with both children’s fathers. She also disputed the suggestion that her mother had behaved violently in the circumstances described by Martinez.
The earlier custody agreement provides context for the current disagreement, but it does not determine the outcome of the latest proceedings. The court must consider the issues raised in the current applications under the applicable legal process.
What Is Known About the Temporary Restraining Order?
A temporary restraining order was granted following Martinez’s application, according to reports published by the Los Angeles Times, The Independent and Global News. The order imposed restrictions on Berry while the dispute remained before the court.
Such an interim order should be distinguished from a final judgment on the underlying allegations. Its existence establishes that temporary restrictions were imposed; it does not, on its own, prove that every allegation in the application is true.
The proceedings also involve questions about the arrangements for Maceo and the extent to which each parent should exercise custody and contact. Those questions are separate from the public statements made by family members and representatives.
Martinez has argued for changes to the existing arrangements, while Berry has contested the allegations and sought to restore the previous shared custody framework. The court’s further consideration will determine what arrangements apply as the case progresses.
The available reporting does not establish a final resolution of the dispute. Any account of the case must therefore distinguish the allegations made in court filings, the denials and responses, the contents of Nahla’s declaration and the temporary measures already imposed.
Background: Halle Berry’s Family and Previous Custody Arrangements
Halle Berry is an Academy Award-winning American actress whose film credits include Monster’s Ball, X-Men and Die Another Day. Her family life has periodically attracted public attention, particularly when legal disputes involving custody have entered the courts.
Berry shares Nahla with Gabriel Aubry and Maceo with Olivier Martinez. The latest proceedings concern Maceo and the arrangements between his parents, rather than a separate case involving Nahla.
The current dispute follows years of co-parenting after Berry and Martinez’s separation. Their 2023 custody agreement forms part of the background to the latest legal disagreement, while Berry’s more recent filings have challenged the way the arrangements have been operating.
Nahla’s declaration adds her personal account to the public record. She described her mother as supportive and denied having witnessed the behaviour alleged by Martinez. Berry has also denied the accusations, while Martinez has maintained his position through the legal process.
The central issues remain the disputed allegations concerning the September incident, the temporary restrictions on Berry’s contact with Maceo and the future custody arrangements. As of 10 October 2026, the matter remains unresolved, with a further hearing reported for 16 October.