When people ask whether Adidas supports Israel, the question can mean different things. It might refer to business operations, partnerships with Israeli organizations, or political alignment with Israel’s government. Understanding these differences is important because global companies like Adidas interact with many countries without necessarily showing political loyalty or support.
About Adidas as a Global Brand
Adidas, founded in 1949 in Germany by Adolf Dassler, is one of the world’s largest sportswear companies. It designs and sells sports clothing, footwear, and accessories in more than 160 countries. The brand is known for sponsoring international sports teams, leagues, and athletes, focusing mainly on performance and lifestyle rather than politics.
Like most global companies, Adidas aims to maintain neutrality. It avoids taking sides in political conflicts and keeps its focus on sports, inclusivity, and innovation. However, since the Israel–Palestine conflict is highly sensitive worldwide, any commercial or sponsorship link involving Israel can attract both support and criticism.
Adidas’s Business Presence in Israel
Adidas’s presence in Israel is relatively small. The company does not have large offices, factories, or corporate centers in the country. Instead, its products are available through local retailers and online shopping platforms that deliver internationally. This means Adidas treats Israel like many other smaller markets—important for sales, but not central to its operations.
In the past, Adidas sponsored the Israel Football Association (IFA), providing kits and equipment for national teams. This was a common type of partnership for the company, as Adidas sponsors dozens of national football associations worldwide. However, in 2018, Palestinian sports groups urged Adidas to end the sponsorship because some IFA-affiliated clubs were reportedly located in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Adidas responded by ending its sponsorship deal and stating that the decision was made as part of routine business adjustments. The company also emphasized that it remains committed to political neutrality, focusing purely on sports and global collaboration rather than national politics.
Adidas’s Political Stance
There is no record of Adidas publicly supporting the Israeli government or its political positions. The company’s press releases, annual reports, and public statements focus on sustainability, equality, and sports development, not political or territorial issues.
Adidas describes itself as a politically neutral global company. Its mission, according to official documents, is to “enable athletes through innovation and inclusivity.” When asked about partnerships with countries in politically sensitive regions, Adidas has consistently maintained that it aims to support sport, not politics.
This stance has occasionally placed Adidas at the center of public controversy. For example, in 2024, Adidas faced criticism from Israeli officials after launching a sneaker campaign featuring model Bella Hadid, who has spoken in support of Palestinian rights. The campaign referenced the 1972 Munich Olympics, an event linked to the killing of Israeli athletes. Following complaints, Adidas quickly revised the campaign and apologized for any offense caused. This showed the company’s sensitivity toward both sides of a highly emotional issue and its effort to avoid alienating consumers.
Efforts to Combat Antisemitism
While maintaining neutrality, Adidas has taken steps to address antisemitism globally. In 2022, after cutting ties with Kanye West (Ye) due to his antisemitic remarks, Adidas announced a partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to combat antisemitism and hate speech. This decision demonstrated Adidas’s broader social responsibility and commitment to protecting communities from discrimination.
However, this does not mean the company supports Israel politically. The initiative was aimed at addressing global antisemitism, not endorsing any specific government. It was first initiated by the US in the world. This distinction between supporting Jewish communities and supporting the Israeli state is important to understand in this debate.
Public Reactions and Pressure
Adidas’s attempts at neutrality have not shielded it from public pressure. Advocacy groups have criticized the company from both sides. Pro-Palestinian activists have accused Adidas of indirectly supporting Israel through business dealings and past sponsorships. On the other hand, some Israeli supporters have accused Adidas of being insensitive or biased when campaigns or partnerships appeared to favor Palestinian narratives.
This dual criticism shows how difficult it is for multinational companies to remain neutral in politically charged environments. For Adidas, each global marketing decision—whether about sponsorship, partnerships, or advertisements—can easily be interpreted as political by different audiences.
The Meaning of “Support”
It’s also important to clarify what “support” means in this context. Selling products in a country or working with local organizations does not necessarily mean a company supports that nation politically. For Adidas, commercial activities are about market presence, not political endorsement.
Similarly, ending a sponsorship or apologizing for a campaign does not signal opposition to any country. It simply reflects a business decision to manage reputation and maintain global consumer trust. Therefore, while Adidas has had commercial connections with Israeli sports in the past, these ties do not automatically translate to political support. The brand’s actions show a consistent pattern of balancing global business interests with political neutrality.
A Broader View: Corporate Neutrality in Conflicts
Adidas’s experience reflects a broader trend among large multinational corporations. Most global brands avoid taking sides in conflicts, focusing instead on universal values like inclusion, equality, and human rights. Publicly supporting one government or another could alienate customers in other regions, harming their business reputation. In Adidas’s case, neutrality allows the brand to stay focused on sports, which is meant to unite people across national and cultural lines. Still, in a world where consumers are more politically aware, even neutrality can be seen as taking a side.
Final Assessment
Based on publicly available information, Adidas does not explicitly support Israel in a political or financial sense. The company once had a sponsorship deal with Israel’s football association, but ended it several years ago. Since then, Adidas has maintained a politically neutral position while continuing to sell products to consumers in Israel, as it does in many other countries.
There is no evidence that Adidas donates to, endorses, or lobbies for the Israeli government. Its corporate focus remains on global sports performance, equality, and innovation. At the same time, Adidas has acted against antisemitism through social initiatives, showing its commitment to combating hate while avoiding political alignment. In simple terms, Adidas’s relationship with Israel is commercial, not political. It operates as a global brand that seeks to serve athletes and customers everywhere, without taking sides in international disputes.
A Balanced Position: Adidas’ Neutral Approach Toward Israel
Adidas has had some connections to Israeli sports organisations and has faced criticism when its marketing touched on sensitive Israel-Palestine issues. The public record does not show that Adidas openly supports Israel in a political sense. The company’s posture appears neutral, aligned with its global business model.
That neutrality means it neither appears to actively champion Israel nor to take overtly affirmative political action on behalf of Israel. For those evaluating whether Adidas supports Israel in a meaningful way, the most accurate statement is that there is no strong public evidence of such support, but also no definitive proof of full disengagement either. The brand seems to navigate a cautious middle path.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
Author: Simona
