Nuclear War on the Horizon | Threatening in 2025

Editorial Team
Credit: Peter1515 from pixabay

Are we on the brink of nuclear war? The Informational Analyse

There has always been this constant threat, ever since World War II. Since World War II, the threat of nuclear conflict has never left our minds despite diplomacy and efforts to control it.
This article explores possible ways to lessen the threats of nuclear weapons in 2025.

Nuclear Weapons Legacy

Atomic weapons have been a major influence on world politics since the very start. Hiroshima was bombed in 1945. Nagasaki, the next year. The Cold War between the United States, the Soviet Union and other countries intensified this arms race.
Many milestones have marked the history of the nucleus.

  1. Cuban Missile Crisis (1962): When U.S. troops found Soviet missiles hidden on Cuba, a nuclear crisis was avoided. Cuban missile Crisis (1962): Diplomatic efforts helped to avoid the crisis. Nevertheless, it exposed the fragility in the global order.
  2. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Its goal was to reduce and spread nuclear arms as well as promote disarmament. This represented a huge step forward for international co-operation.
  3. The Cold War ends (1991). After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, significant agreements on arms reduction were signed like START.

In international politics, it has left a legacy marked by competition and distrust, which is fueling fears of nuclear war.

Current geopolitical tendencies

Trends and hotspots in the geopolitical landscape will influence nuclear risk by 2025.

1. Rivalry of the United States with China
United States against China is an aggressive strategic relationship that spans technologies, trades and military strengths. Washington has expressed concern over China’s rapid technological modernization. This includes the nuclear weapons capability. U.S. measures to counter China’s Indo-Pacific dominance also increase tensions.
2. Russia in its Role
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, in 2022, marked a pivotal moment in global security dynamics. NATO and Russia face a direct conflict. Occasionally, intimidation has used nuclear rhetoric. Russia’s large nuclear arsenal and willingness in asserting power over adjacent areas remains of concern.
3. North Korea
North Korea’s relentless development of nuclear and ballistic missiles, along with its persistent pursuit of advanced technology in this area, is a threat to regional stability. Pyongyang has continued to advance its nuclear agenda, despite the sanctions imposed by the international community.
4. Middle East instability
Some potential flashpoints could include the tensions that exist between Iran & Israel, or Iran’s Nuclear Program. The consequences of an unwise decision or escalation in such volatile regions can be disastrous.
5. Emerging Technologies
These technologies, such as hypersonic missiles, cyber warfare, and advancements in AI, complicate nuclear strategies. They can reduce the threshold of conflict or even result in an accident escalation.

Nuclear War and the Assessment of Risk

The probability of a nuclear attack does not decrease, even if the event is unlikely. Analysts consider a wide range of factors to establish the probabilities.
1. Miscalculation
In the past, miscommunications have led to deadly wars. Cuban Missile Crisis along with incidents like Soviet Nuclear False Alarm in 1983 highlight the need for clear communication.
2. Intensification of conventional conflict
A nuclear-armed country or one of its allies might be involved in a conflict in the local area or region that escalates. In many cases, such as in the ongoing war between Ukraine and China about Taiwan and other areas of conflict that are escalating to catastrophic levels.
3. Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
As more nations acquire nuclear weapons, the risk of war will increase. While efforts like the NPT limit nuclear proliferation, nations such as North Korea could challenge this framework.
4. Non-State actor
Terrorist groups that obtain nuclear technologies or material pose a unique and unpredictable threat. Even if the likelihood is low, it would have severe consequences.

International Measures To Prevent A Nuclear War

Despite the risks, several efforts are being made to decrease the chance of a nuclear conflict.
1. Arms Control Agreements
A new START agreement, which is currently in effect and has been extended till 2026, plays a crucial role in the control of the nuclear arsenal. However, the fragility of efforts like INF Treaty can be seen in erosions to other agreements.
2. Dialogue, Diplomacy and Dialog
High-level discussions with the two major players, the United States and Russia, as well as China, are essential. To facilitate collaboration, a multilateral platform like the United Nations or International Atomic Energy Agency is essential.
3. Civil Society Advocacy
ICAN is an organization that works to disarm the world. It won the Nobel Peace Prize last year.
4. Actions to build your confidence
In order to reduce miscommunication, it is possible to use increased transparency as well as initiatives aimed at building confidence. These include joint exercises between military forces and hotlines.

Public Perceptions and Preparedness

The geopolitical situation affects the level of public fear about nuclear war. In Europe and East Asia, nuclear war is a bigger concern due to their closeness to hot spots. The degree of readiness for nuclear conflict varies greatly.

  1. Instruction: In certain countries, government officials instruct their citizens on how to act if a nuclear weapon is launched. However, this practice is becoming less common than during the Cold War.
  2. Infrastructure: Some countries have built shelters or warning systems, but lack financial resources.
  3. Nuclear war fear can bring about anxiety and fatalism.

How to Reduce Threat?

Atomic war is an existential threat to which governments, individuals, and organisations can put an end.

  1. Arms Reduction Promotion. It is important to support policies that promote disarmament and those leaders. This will help influence both the national and world agenda.
  2. Propagating adherence conventions like NPTs as well as advocating new agreements will help to stabilize the world’s security.
  3. Unrestricted communication in a dialogic environment reduces mistakes.
  4. Informing the Public: By increasing public awareness, it is possible to increase the support for pre-emptive action.
  5. Investment in technology protection: Integrating new nuclear technologies with existing strategies can reduce the risk of accidental escalation.

Conclusion

Even though the possibility of a nuclear war is grave, its eventuality cannot be predicted. For the community to successfully prevent an event of this magnitude, they must be vigilant, committed, and cooperative. To achieve a safe and secure world, it is important to work together with others.

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.
Share This Article
The Brussels Morning Newspaper Logo

Subscribe for Latest Updates