It’s hard to miss the quiet symbolism in Riyadh this week. On September 17, amid the opulent hush of Al Yamamah Palace, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif put pen to paper on a mutual defense agreement that feels less like a routine diplomatic handshake and more like a subtle insurrection against the old order.
The deal commits both nations to treat an attack on one as an assault on the other, formalizing a bond that’s been whispered about for years but now stands starkly in the open. This isn’t just another treaty – it’s a quiet revolution, upending the fragile equilibria of the Middle East and South Asia while casting a long shadow over America’s fading grip on the world’s most volatile crossroads.
The Middle East, that perennial theater of proxy battles and petrodollar politics, looks markedly different in the pact’s wake. Saudi Arabia has long played the role of Washington’s favored client, pouring billions into American weaponry – some $80 billion in military spending last year alone, making it the world’s seventh-biggest spender. But trust has frayed. The Trump administration’s recent $142 billion arms bonanza with Riyadh notwithstanding, the Gulf states have watched with growing unease as U.S. commitments waver.
Israel’s brazen strike on Doha last week, aimed at Hamas negotiators during fragile truce talks, exposed the limits of American deterrence; Gulf leaders, reliant on U.S. bases in Bahrain and Qatar, are questioning whether Washington’s “ironclad” guarantees are worth the paper they’re printed on.
Pakistan steps into this breach not as a junior partner but as a strategic equalizer. With nuclear warheads in its arsenal, Islamabad brings a deterrent punch that’s been sharpened against India but could now echo across the Arabian Peninsula. The agreement doesn’t spell out nuclear sharing but it deepens joint exercises, intelligence swaps, and rapid-response mechanisms, building on decades of collaboration where Pakistani pilots have trained Saudis and Islamabad has stationed troops in the kingdom during crises like the 1990 Gulf War.
“There is nothing inherently alarmist about the Pakistan-Saudi mutual defense arrangement when viewed with historical and strategic context,”
notes Christopher Clary, a South Asia specialist, emphasizing its role in signaling unity against shared threats rather than igniting new ones.
For Iran, the Saudi-Pakistan defense pact introduces a mix of opportunities and uncertainties. While Pakistan’s longstanding ties with both Tehran and Riyadh position Islamabad as a potential mediator to bolster the fragile 2023 Saudi-Iran truce – especially amid shared concerns over Israel’s recent strikes, including the September 9 attack on Doha and June’s Twelve-Day War assaults on Iranian sites – the alignment could also exacerbate tensions.
Tehran’s support for allied groups like the Houthis in Yemen, which has dialed back under the May 2025 US-Houthi ceasefire but previously strained Riyadh relations through attacks on Saudi targets, might complicate this dynamic if perceived as a threat under the new pact. Iranian and Saudi foreign ministers’ recent discussions on the agreement suggest room for dialogue, yet the risk of escalation lingers, particularly if the pact is viewed in Tehran as tilting the balance toward containment of Iranian influence.
Yet, there’s a silver lining in this realignment: it nudges the region toward multipolarity. Saudi Arabia’s warming to Tehran, brokered by China in 2023, might accelerate as Riyadh diversifies beyond U.S. patronage, weaving in Beijing’s Belt and Road investments – already $26 billion strong in Pakistan’s corridors – and Russia’s arms overtures.
Analysts see this as part of a broader Gulf pivot, where states like the UAE and Bahrain hedge against American retrenchment by courting non-Western powers. The pact, in essence, isn’t about conjuring an “Islamic NATO,” as some breathless commentators suggest, but about reclaiming agency in a landscape scarred by colonial divisions and endless interventions.
The shockwaves don’t stop at the Gulf; they ripple into South Asia, where the Indo-Pakistani fault line has defined security for generations. Pakistan’s defense outlay, a relatively modest $8 billion last year against India’s $86 billion juggernaut, suddenly gains leverage through Saudi backing. Remittances and aid from Riyadh – over $2 billion annually – have long buoyed Islamabad’s economy, but this deal elevates the partnership to a deterrent multiplier. An Indian incursion in Kashmir, like the “surgical strikes” of 2016 or 2019, might now invite Saudi economic muscle or even diplomatic isolation, compelling New Delhi to think twice.
So far, India has responded with caution, expressing unease about the potential consequences of the development for its national security and the stability of the region and beyond. Concerns linger that the situation could fuel nuclear proliferation or draw Middle Eastern conflicts into the subcontinent. The alliance signals a significant geopolitical shift in West Asia, likely pushing India to deepen its Quad partnerships with the United States, Japan, and Australia, while strengthening ties with Israel to balance regional dynamics. Smaller South Asian countries, such as Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, may seek new alliances in response, risking further division within regional forums like SAARC.
At the heart of this realignment lies a pointed critique of America’s role, once the unchallenged architect of Middle Eastern security but now a spectator to its own eclipse. The Abraham Accords, that 2020 bid to normalize Israeli-Arab relations, look increasingly hollow as Saudi priorities shift toward pan-Islamic solidarity amid Gaza’s devastation.
Trump’s administration, focused on lucrative deals like the recent $142 billion arms package, has signaled disinterest in new entanglements, prioritizing deterrence against Iran without the messy commitments of yesteryear. Yet this pact underscores the irony: U.S. arms flood the region – $38 billion annually to Gulf states – while allies like Saudi Arabia shop for alternatives, from Pakistani JF-17 jets co-built with China to Russian S-400 systems.
This defense pact is a symptom of deeper currents: the Global South’s weariness with Washington’s scripts, from Sykes-Picot to endless wars on terror. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, bound by faith and necessity, are scripting their own narrative – one of mutual reliance amid uncertainty. But paradigms don’t shift without friction; missteps could ignite escalations from Yemen to Kashmir. Washington would do well to listen, trading hubris for humility, lest it find itself sidelined in a world it once presumed to police. For the people caught in these crosswinds, true security isn’t forged in pacts but in the elusive pursuit of peace, free from the empires’ long shadows
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
