Thinking strategically beyond the Middle East
Following the event and causes of the current situation from a geopolitical perspective, it implies a security and economic strategy for understanding the Middle East war. When we think more strategically, the internal actors and external strategy of rival countries such as Russia and Turkey will cause Syria two-phased: Firstly, the asymmetric war and the Anglo-Saxon alliance interconnected with Israel, changing the group’s influence. Second, We need chaos to establish new processes with the gain and loss, referred by the land ownership and new establishment. This will be used to store Syria’s military and economic capabilities.
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has made bold plans and has a development vision that we also look forward to. There are undoubtedly many meeting points we can reach [with Saudi Arabia] … cooperating in the economy and development”
and other fields NEWARABS.
This also means gains in Such a strategic interest in oil and diplomacy with the Gulf Coast and the new democratic leadership.
Reordering, establishing, and navigating sea control
When thinking about the Syrian relationship with the Saudis. There is a functioning front line connected to the proxy attack in southern Lebanon and Houthis. The question is who controls the rest of the arabs’ territory and maritime in the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Strategic location controlling access to the Strait of Hormuz is vital for resolving the conflict on the sea and creating a new strategic geopolitical position for significant oil and gas reserves and providing energy. The network of proxies is used to exert influence regionally but also offers the ability to disrupt Israel with drones and cyberattacks. Vulnerability to asymmetric Warfare from actors like Hezbollah and Hamas presents correlated points between asymmetric operations from Houthis attacking the Red Sea. In keeping with the slogan on the Houthis’ flag: ” Allahu Akbar, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse be upon the Jews, Victory for Islam.”Shlomo Guetta
The conflict between Iran and Israel will cause more than regional implications that will reflect on the global system. The first is the large-scale conflict between proxies that will escalate further. At the same time, Iran denies using the Houthis, Iran’s UN Amir Saeid Iravani.
Israel and Hamas
Israel keeps fighting from multifront, coming from southern Lebanon and Gaza—methods to defense justify both countries, as they claim the right to self-defense. Iran is also using tactical methods with Hamas operation in Gaza by terror as one form of deterring their intention and making casualties on civilians. One of the strengths is that Israel can use its military and technological capabilities to control Iranian expansion and threats. A good relationship with Syria creates a new paradigm for Israel and Syria when achieving a common goal. Hamas has proposed a week-long cease-fire during which it would provide a list of Israeli captives held in Gaza Zein Khalil. The ongoing discussion of the release of hostages and pressure from proxies create an unknown destiny and new difficulties Israel is facing.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
