Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Sunday, June 26, 2022
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home EU Institutions Parliament

Taxonomy: Parliament rejects nuclear and gas

Marta Pacheco by Marta Pacheco
15 June 2022
in Parliament
Nuclear,Power,Plant,Cooling,Towers

nuclear power plant cooling towers

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Belgium, (Brussels Morning Newspaper) MEPs in the Environment and Economic Affairs committees voted yesterday against including nuclear and gas in the EU’s taxonomy of sustainable investments. The objection was adopted with 76 votes for, 62 against, and 4 abstentions. 

Yesterday’s vote reopens a game that seemed closed, with a majority, albeit thin, defending that nuclear and gas are not green investments.

The issue now moves to the Parliament’s full plenary from July 4 to July 7, where the EU executive proposal has to be rejected by an absolute majority of 353 MEPs to be killed.

The taxonomy has been steering strong passions, with opponents saying the Commission is creating a loophole for polluting technologies, while advocates say it’s the best way to rapidly cut greenhouse gas emissions.

MEPs Fabio Massimo Castaldo and Laura Ferrara
MEPs Laura Ferrara and Fabio Massimo Castaldo 

“Nuclear and gas cannot be classified as sustainable investments simply because they are two polluting and waste-producing energy sources. The sustainable transition, on the other hand, must be synonymous with renewable and clean energy, everything else is greenwashing which the European Union must oppose. Including gas in the taxonomy is also a gift to Putin and the fossil fuel lobbies that we cannot afford right now,” MEPs Fabio Massimo Castaldo and Laura Ferrara told Brussels Morning in a joint statement.

The centrists MEP Pascal Canfin explained in a LinkedIn post why he did not vote for the objection: “These two energies, which are not green, are precisely not in the “green” category of the Taxonomy but in the “Useful for the transition” category. On the other hand, these activities can only be included under strict cumulative conditions.”

Canfin went on saying that gas cannot be considered “useful for the transition” only if it replaces coal — and therefore allows CO2 emission gains — below the “Do no significant harm” threshold, subject to verification annually by an independent third party and for a limited period until 2030.

Overall, MEPs recognise the role of nuclear and fossil gas in guaranteeing stable energy supply during the transition to a sustainable economy. But they consider that the technical screening standards proposed by the Commission, in its delegated regulation, to support their inclusion do not respect the criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activities

The Commission’s proposal is widely seen as a fudge intended to placate both Paris, which supports nuclear energy, and Berlin as it also attached a green label to natural gas, which Germany has insisted is essential as a transition technology.

Last year, President Emmanuel Macron said he favoured “nuclear power being integrated into the taxonomy” on green finance in an address before the European Committee of the Regions.

“To definitively reject the delegated act of the Commission, it will now be necessary to reach an absolute majority of MEPs, but after this vote we are optimistic that we can do it. At the next plenary in July, the 5 Star Movement will vote with conviction to confirm today’s vote and to defend the environmental transition that is based on renewable energies and not on nuclear and gas,” added Castaldo and Ferrara.

Tags: Main-SliderParliament rejects nuclear and gas

Latest post

Mont,De,Marsan,Landes,France,05,17,2019,Eurofighter,Typhoon

German MTU hopes for new contracts in Luftwaffe overhaul

8 hours ago
Flags,Of,Moldova,European,Union,And,Ukraine

Supporting Moldova means supporting stability in Ukraine

1 day ago

Most Read

  • These are the 10 highest paying jobs in the Europe in 2022

    These are the 10 highest paying jobs in the Europe in 2022

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Are The Highest Paying Jobs In Luxembourg?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Energy Recovery Fund

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Are The Highest Paying Jobs In Finland?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • A taste of Croatian flavors of the diplomacy in Brussels

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • EU Institutions
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Member States
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Print Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT