Terror and abuse are daily news; one of the keys is Actors who initiate legal action, advocating human rights and security. Why do we face more changes coming after the Israel-Gaza war, and what format of communication and ideology promotes more radicalization of groups? How do individuals contradict and abuse human rights at the same time?
Terrorism changed reality
Whether we want to address this openly or not, the educational system, political culture, and social media are contributors to terrorism. This is not a very serious look when we have a radicalized group and more terrorism spreading across Europe by politicians. Understanding how to detect and act correctly and with methods to counter terrorism inside the international governmental organization is crucial for peace-building policies. Nonstate and state actors possess the trait of separatist groups working together as an “organization.” One is Hamas, and we can track its movement and attacks. The pattern of terrorism can be found in data between 1997-2001. The ideology forces these groups to work together to build fundamentalist communities by using victimization of ideological agenda. This can be relatable through rapid, unpredictable time attacks with networks and intelligence—violations of Human rights and the suffering of civilians. The state must Implement this resolution as a direct instrument, UN 2396 (2017), to fight extremism. It’s a power of the digitalization age where the flux of disinformation and our perception of disproportionality with biases from daily newspapers—bring more conflict, racism, and discrimination into society than we witnessed last year regarding the securty and global actors reaching.
Can we build strong format for antisemitism
Humanitarian principles are crucial for integrating and including refugees and minorities and are essential to nurturing our legal system. Therefore, the example can be taken from how this International organization, when policymakers try to represent pragmatic and optional solutions that will protect and respect all religions, they fail to present, according to UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese, being condiment Israel’s “colonization “of Gaza. When October 7, 2023, happened, it can be evidently in detail here A/HRC/56/CRP. 4 What this means to us: This is why we face more contradictions and double standards but cannot be honest about them. Terrorism is a serious crime; it can’t be justified by any standard or means, especially for someone who acts professionally on Human rights. This can be evidenced herein in further human rights discussions with OHCR. There are many examples of why and how we constable demolished human rights and promoted the further existence of proxies that work to abuse and terrorize innocent. One of the interviewees said that the statement of their young students, “expel the Jews” from Jerusalem and want to “design missiles and planes” because “it’s the best thing for the resistance.” I was taking serious concern as a case of antisemitism.
“Ideological transmission and learning is a normal social and cultural process.”
– CREST
Current Europe and future outcome
As discussed, the government’s national policy failed due to worldwide organizations pressuring human rights issues and promoting ideology rather than security. This has been the agenda for centuries; today, we see the correlation between this group operating. German police arrested four suspected Hamas members, three detained in Berlin and another in the Netherlands, who were planning a terror attack against Jewish institutions in Berlin ICT. This becomes a question for the Christian community and others who reject their ideological propaganda. When asking questions about the terrorism movement today, we can see the segment of fragmented societies left. Consider the leaders and promote certain statements that help young people shape beliefs to make the organization come alive.
You can take what you want from this. The key is awareness.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
