Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Thursday, August 11, 2022
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home EU Institutions

Debate # 1: Is taxation about wealth-creation or redistribution?

BrusselsMorning by BrusselsMorning
22 February 2021
in EU Institutions
Debate # 1: Is taxation about wealth-creation or redistribution?
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The first in a series of Brussels Morning debates, two MEPs from the Czech Republic debate the purpose of taxation.

Brussels (Brussels Morning) While the European Commission has named and shamed EU member states for facilitating tax avoidance, taxation policies are made at the national level and the European Council is the body with whom members can consensus over taxation policy. Currently, that consensus does not exist. 

There are different ways in dealing with this challenge.

French President Emmanuel Macron is calling for a harmonised corporate taxation rate vis-à-vis digital giants like Google, Apple and Facebook. Such a policy, if adopted, could hurt the economic model of member states competing on the basis of “business-friendly” taxation regimes. A case in point: one of Macron’s predecessors, President Sarkozy, introduced an “exit tax” to avoid the relocation of luxury behemoth LVMH. 

The debate boils down to a simple question. Should taxation be seen as an element of competition – “wealth creation” – or is taxation first and foremost a political decision governing redistribution?

In this Brussels Morning debate Czech politician Luděk Niedermayer MEP (EPP) argues tax competition could stimulate economies, while his compatriot Mikuláš Peksa MEP (Greens) says that notion is “illusory”.

Tax competition is good 

Luděk Niedermayer. Tax competition is positive for the single market because it promotes economic competitiveness.

In modern society, there is huge demand for public services. Without functional free education, availability of healthcare and social services we could hardly imagine how modern and stable society would function. 

The cost of services, including traditional ones (army, police, legal system) is financed by taxes collected from taxpayers. If taxes are high they do not just substantially reduce ‘reward for activity’ but also undermines the development of the economy (reducing incentives or even capital to invest).

Without competition between tax systems, there would be no incentives to find a balance in setting up the level of taxation (tax quota) and public expenditures, or good structure of taxes (less harming economy). 

It seems to me that some modern democracies are in fact, to a certain degree, successful in finding a reasonable and sustainable balance when taking into account both tax competitiveness and good examples of systems used elsewhere.

At the same time, I firmly believe that ‘competition’ should exclude policies, which are not focused on good “domestic“ systems of taxation but are aimed to transfer tax bases from different countries, which have nothing or very little to do with real, economic activities. I consider this policy not only unfair but also undermining the efficiency of the economy but also the functionality and competitiveness of the single market.

Tax competition should come in hand with transparency. Optimally, the rules for taxation (for example corporate profit taxes) should be rather simple, and competition should take place in a form of setting up the tax rate. Different preferential regimes, exceptions or selective tax breaks in my view have similar, negative effects as policies mentioned above- lower efficiency of the economy and obvious, higher taxation for others – if someone were allowed to pay less, the other would have to pay more.

That’s why I believe within the EU we should not aim to “harmonise taxation“ per se but to firstly increase tax transparency, quickly phase out practices that distort markets and fairness, while also allowing countries to decide whether they want to be economies with fewer public services, but lower taxes or the opposite. At the same time, in certain cases — excise taxes, environmental taxes, VAT, etc. — harmonising or at least setting up a minimal level would make sense.

Let’s end the race to the bottom

Mikuláš Peksa. Taxation in the single market must cease to be a race to the bottom. While the advocates of tax competition like to depict their opponents as sacrificing ‘business-friendly environment’ on the altar of ‘tax justice’, such label should rightfully be rejected as a red herring.

The contention that aggressive tax-setting cultivates business environment and facilitates wealth creation is illusory, as well as normatively problematic. Here, I intend to challenge it on the following grounds. First, hawkish tax-setting is detrimental to ‘fiscal self-determination’. Countries engaging in ‘capital poaching’ are not determining ‘optimal levels taxation’, but rather they are trying to accrue revenue at the expense of other states. Other states are thus forced to alter their fiscal policies so as to avert capital flight, a fact particularly relevant to small economies.

Not only does this compromise their ‘redistributive goals’ but also forces other states to adjust their ‘fiscal climate’ results in suboptimal outcomes,a ccording to a 1998 OECD report. Distortion of financial and real investment flows, discouragement of taxpayer compliance and increases in administrative costs are only some of its likely outcomes.

In this sense, tax competition is analogous to Bertrand competition – only here, the citizens end up being worse off.  Second, even if ‘self-determination’ is not something that we endorse, as Peter Fietsch wrote in 2015, aggressive tax competition is objectionable on the grounds of “widen[ing] the income gap both between capital owners and everyone else“. 

Considering the already-wide economic inequalities present in most Western societies, this is a cause for worry. If favourable economic conditions are of our primary concern, increases in inequality, which already causes significant political instabilities – are not something we should blindly pursue.

Especially if tax shenanigans result in under-provision of public services on which the least fortunate are most dependent.  Third, if a part of the EU’s long-term strategy is to attain a sustainable and stable world governance, then aggressive tax policies are going to be of little use. As a 2015, IMF reports note, developing countries are disproportionately hit by profit shifting and base erosion of multi-national compaies, a phenomenon likely to be reinforced by further tax incentives. Setting optimal rather than aggressive tax rates would prevent such risk, potentially allowing the developed countries to attain their goals vis-à-vis developing countries more swiftly and with lesser need for redistributive measures. 

Finally, the notion that higher taxation ceteris paribus dissuades economic activity – an argument often invoked by tax competition advocates – remains an untestable proposition. Given that tax avoidance by and large allows companies to make tax contributions disproportionate to their regional economic activity, we are unable to confirm that higher taxation would indeed act as a deterrent.

Tags: DebatesMain-SliderMEP

Latest post

Broken umbrellas get a second life in raincoats

Broken umbrellas get a second life in raincoats

14 hours ago
Four Brussels police officers in jail since the beginning of this year

Four Brussels police officers in jail since the beginning of this year

14 hours ago

Most Read

  • colleagues in a meeting room

    What Are The Highest Paying Jobs In Finland?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Losing Balance on Bosnia and Herzegovina

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Here Are 10 Highest Paying Jobs In Norway 

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Are The Highest Paying Jobs In Luxembourg?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • These are the 10 highest paying jobs in the Europe in 2022

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • EU Institutions
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Member States
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Print Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT