Print Magazine
Brussels Morning Newspaper
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home Brussels

Criticism of opposition to energy ordinance: ‘Won’t lure new suppliers’

Helen Critchley by Helen Critchley
12 March 2022
in Brussels
Criticism of opposition to energy ordinance: ‘Won’t lure new suppliers’
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

BRUSSELS (Brussels Morning) – In the plenary session of the Brussels parliament on Friday there was a long debate about the new energy ordinance, which MP Christophe De Beuckelaer (CDH) called “the most important of this entire legislature”. The opposition is not convinced that the new arrangement will attract additional suppliers. The debate shows that the financial consequences for Brussels residents of the introduction of the ‘protected customer’ status at Sibelga have not been calculated by energy regulator Brugel.

With the new energy ordinance – a 400-page document that was passed through parliament in a few days – the government wants to attract new energy suppliers as well as protect customers, and support the Brussels energy transition to renewable sources. The latter is done by enabling energy communities. These should actually have been introduced last year, within the framework of the transposition of an EU directive on this.

Majority and opposition are satisfied with the introduction of the energy community. A pilot project in a social housing block in Sint-Gillis apparently yielded an average price for the participants that is 30 percent lower than the current social rate.

Dissatisfaction with justice of the peace

But there was much less consensus on the first part of the ordinance. In particular, the fact that suppliers still have to go through a procedure before the justice of the peace to stop deliveries to defaulters is a thorn in the side of MR, CDH and N-VA.

That procedure can take a very long time and all the while the supplier has to continue to supply customers who ultimately do not show up at the court hearing in 80 percent of the cases, said MP Viviane Teitelbaum (MR). “In 90 percent of the cases, the justice of the peace then decides to stop the deliveries. This is not a protection but a sanction, it does not help the poor. The justices of the peace are themselves asking to reform this system.”

She advocates the installation of a conciliation procedure similar to that in the other regions, which would work much faster.

Cieltje Van Achter (N-VA) called the “left-wing overprotection” of customers something that “ultimately makes all Brussels residents worse”. “The suppliers are not paid, but they must continue to pay their levies to Sibelga, and the debts of the citizens are mounting. This is detrimental to everyone. The question was precisely to do something about this. The federation of energy suppliers Febeg already announced on Monday let it be known that your ordinance does not help.”

Teitelbaum and Christophe De Beuckelaer (CDH) referred to the advice of energy regulator Brugel on the new ordinance, which on that basis called itself “sceptical” about a possible return or arrival of new suppliers.

The fact that defaulters with debts after refusal by two suppliers are now allowed to apply for the status of ‘protected customer’ from network operator Sibelga, also raises questions at Van Achter about the cost price of this new measure. “What is the cost of this system and what will be passed on to Brussels residents?”

Minister Maron did not answer those questions directly, but did say in his answers later that energy regulator Brugel had shown itself sceptical based on an old version of the ordinance.

Tags: BrugelBrusselsChristophe De BeuckelaerEnergy ordinanceFeaturedMain-Slider

Latest post

The Brexit Final Act

Britain prepares law to override parts of Brexit treaty

15 hours ago
Berlin

What Are 10 Best Hotels In Berlin?

17 hours ago

Most Read

  • shutterstock_1821616664

    MEPs send Open Letter urging the Home Secretary Priti Patel to reject Assange’s extradition

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • These are the 10 highest paying jobs in the Europe in 2022

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why corruption matters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Brussels residents want to set up school for Ukrainian children

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Government approves route for ‘Mediatram’ from Meiser

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Belgium News
  • Brussels
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • EU Institutions
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Member States
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Print Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT