Our Magazine
Brussels Morning Online Newspaper
Tuesday, April 20, 2021
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Online Newspaper
  • Home
    • About Us
  • EU institutions
    • Commission
    • Parliament
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • The American Angle
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Southeast Europe
Brussels Morning Online Newspaper
No Result
View All Result
Home Europe

Pressure builds for Scottish First Minister’s resignation

Sophia Akram by Sophia Akram
4 March 2021
in Europe
Pressure builds for Scottish First Minister’s resignation
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

London (Brussels Morning) Pressure on Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to resign intensified over the last few days as an evidence session took place Wednesday, looking at the Scottish government’s unlawful inquiry into allegations against former first minister, Alex Salmond.

The former Scottish National Party (SNP) leader says Sturgeon and others broke conspired against him and that they broke ministerial code when investigating allegations of sexual misconduct.

Two committees will report on Salmond’s claims, the first having already heard evidence from the 66-year-old politician last week with Sturgeon speaking yesterday.

Timeline of events

Key event start in March 2018 with a meeting between Sturgeon and Salmond’s former chief of staff Geoff Aberdein at her parliamentary offices on the 29th of that month. Sturgeon downplayed the encounter but witnesses say harassment accusations were discussed and a complainant name revealed.

This information contradicted claims Sturgeon made that she found out about the allegations on 2 April when Salmond came to her home and when he said she made clear she would intervene in the complaints process.

Sturgeon and Salmond have been political allies in the leadership of the SNP for more than decade and have overseen a campaign for Scottish independence from the rest of the UK, which has gained considerable ground over the last few years.

Sturgeon only made her knowledge of the events evident to the permanent secretary Leslie Evans on 6 June, and by 29 August Salmond launched a judicial review of the Scottish government’s handling of misconduct claims against him.

By the end of the year, the government conceded and on 8 January 2019, its inquiry was ruled unlawful, “tainted with apparent bias”, giving Salmond a 512,000-pound award to cover his legal costs.

Salmond was still charged with 14 sexual assault offences but was acquitted last year.

A policy is also in question, introduced in 2017, targeting sexist and inappropriate behaviour. It is under the guise of this policy that the women came forward to accuse Salmond of misconduct. Salmond believes this policy was always aimed at him and that Sturgeon misled Parliament by way of conspiracy against him.

The policy was also rewritten, removing the First minister’s role in the complaints process, with it stating she should only be informed of an investigation after it finished.

Sturgeon, however, has said Salmond’s accusations are retaliation for not colluding with him.

Testimony

In a written submission, Sturgeon wrote:

“In what was a very difficult situation – personally, politically and professionally – I tried to do the right thing. Whether I always got it absolutely right is something I still reflect on, and the Committee will consider, but I sought all along to act in good faith and to strike the right balance of judgment given the difficult issues I was confronted with.

“In the light of the #MeToo movement, I sought to ensure that the Scottish Government developed a process that allowed allegations of sexual harassment – including allegations of a historic nature – to be fully and fairly considered.

“I did not do this because I had a concern… that allegations about my predecessor could materialise. But nor did I, in any way, allow such concern to lead me to limit the scope of the procedure.

“I agreed to meet a friend of 30 years when I was told he was in distress and wanted to talk to me about a serious matter. And it is certainly the case that I was anxious to prepare my Party as far as possible for an issue that, at different stages, I thought could be about to become public”.

Inquiry

The inquiry sought to answer key questions about when Sturgeon learned of concerns around Salmond’s alleged behaviour, why she continued speaking with him and if she offered to intervene on his behalf. It also sought to establish why Sturgeon took so long in informing the permanent secretary about what she knew and whether the first minister’s action went against legal advice as well as establishing any knowledge about the leak.

In the marathon session, Sturgeon insisted suggestions of a conspiracy were “absurd”, claiming evidence submitted by Salmond was presented out of context.

She said she simply refused to allow “the age-old pattern of allowing a powerful man to use his status and connections to get what he wants” to prevail.

Evidence also emerged that the Scottish government ignored legal advice that it would lose the judicial review. Sturgeon apologised for the “very serious mistake” and loss of taxpayers money.

Sturgeon has always insisted she forgot about meeting Aberdein on 29 March, in defence for its non-disclosure and she said exclusion of the first minister in the harassment complaints process was “appropriate”.

On the leaks, Sturgeon said, “I don’t know where the leaks came from. I can tell you where I know they didn’t come from, they didn’t come from me, they didn’t come from anybody acting on my authority”.

Will Sturgeon survive?

Commentators say the nationalist leader’s performance was a mixed bag, at times relaxed while at others under strain from contradicting evidence — opposition MSPs, in particular, showed incredulity at Sturgeon’s testimony.

While allegations of Salmond’s criminality was acquitted by a jury, Sturgeon noted he was not always appropriate, prompting Scottish Conservative Margaret Mitchell to remind the first minister that it was not Salmond on trial, but her.

The Scottish Conservatives will reportedly pursue a vote of no confidence in the first minister but there is little probability it will get the backing it needs, particularly while both committees are active.

The debacle comes at a particularly inconvenient time with elections due in May, which could be a keystone for a second referendum on Scottish independence, driven by the governing SNP.

However, the scandal has divided the party, with Salmond and Sturgeon with their respective backers. The possibility remains those fissures filter through to the polls in two months.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Tags: Main-SliderWestminster Review
Sophia Akram

Sophia Akram

Sophia Akram is the Brussels Morning London correspondent. Based in London, Sophia is a journalist with a portfolio rich in human rights, politics and foreign policy coverage, plus extensive experience in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

Latest post

Montenegro, the Balkans and Chinese loans: a cautionary tale

Montenegro, the Balkans and Chinese loans: a cautionary tale

11 mins ago
Washington may have to chose between European and Middle East allies

Washington may have to chose between European and Middle East allies

47 mins ago

Most Read

  • A very Georgian provokatsiya

    A very Georgian provokatsiya

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • EC to investigate €1bn worth of missing lumber in Croatian forests

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Salmond’s strategic masterstroke

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The explorer of non-places: interview with one of the world’s most intrepid travellers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Seeking climate consensus amidst Sino-American rivalry

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Subscribe
Facebook Twitter Youtube LinkedIn

About Us

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.

Category

  • Ambassador’s Corner
  • Commission
  • Council
  • Culture and Society
  • Diplomacy
  • Economy
  • EU Institutions
  • Europe
  • Europe With Transparency
  • Features
  • In Depth
  • Member States
  • Middle East Eye
  • Opinion
  • Our pick
  • Parliament
  • Place de la Bourse
  • Southeast Europe
  • Sustainable Perspective
  • The American Angle
  • The Macro-Economist
  • Uncategorised
  • US Elections
  • World

More info

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQ
  • Jobs

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • EU Institutions
    • Parliament
    • Commission
    • Council
  • Europe
  • World
  • Member States
  • Economy
  • Culture and Society
  • In Depth
    • Ambassador’s Corner
    • Europe With Transparency
    • Place de la Bourse
    • The Macro-Economist
    • Sustainable Perspective
    • The American Angle
    • Southeast Europe
  • Magazine

Brussels Morning Newspaper - All Rights Reserved © 2020

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT